SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(SC) 181

2012 (4) SCC 51
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
S.H. KAPADIA, CJI., A.K. PATNAIK & SWATANTER KUMAR, JJ.
"In Re: Networking of Rivers"
Writ Petition (Civil) No. 512 of 2002 with Writ Petition (Civil) No. 668 of 2002
Decided on : 27-02-2012.

IMPORTANT POINT
Interlinking of rivers is a programme of national importance and should be fulfilled.

Headnote:(a) Environmental laws – Conservation of water – Interlinking of rivers – Admittedly there are difficulties in preparation of DPRs, execution, financing and consensus building – Still, to carry out these projects more effectively and with greater sensitivity is the need of the hour. (Para 34)

       (b) Environmental law – Conservation of water – Interlinking of rivers – Economic aspects of effective irrigation discussed. (Para 36 to 46)

       (c) Constitution of India – Article 262 r/w section 11, Inter-State Water Disputes Act, 1956 – Jurisdiction of Supreme Court will be ousted only with regard to the adjudication of the dispute and not all matters incidental thereto – Supreme Court can exercise jurisdiction u/s 4 of the Act – Section 11 could refer only to such disputes as are already referred to a Tribunal where jurisdiction of Supreme Court is ousted – Kind of coordination contemplated under River Boards Act, 1956 is required to be generated at all levels to implement the inter-linking of rivers programme. (Para 54, 59)

       AIR 1990 SC 1316; (2000) 9 SCC 572 – Relied upon

       Facts of the case:

       This batch of cases raise very important issue of interlinking of the rivers.

       Finding of the Court:

       Interlinking of rivers is a programme of national importance and should be fulfilled.

       Result: All matters disposed of with directions.

JUDGMENT

Swatanter Kumar, J.-Nearly ten years back, the petitioner in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 668 of 2002, a practicing advocate, instituted the petition based on some study that there was a need to conserve water and properly utilize the available resources. Thus, the present petition has been instituted with the following prayers:-

"a. Issue an appropriate writ order or direction, more particularly a writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent no. 1 to take appropriate steps/action to nationalize all the rivers in the country.

b. Issue an appropriate writ order or direction, more particularly a writ in the nature of Mandamus, directing the respondent No. 1 to take appropriate steps/action to inter link the rivers in the southern peninsula namely, Ganga, Kaveri, Vaigai and Tambaravani.

c. Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to formulate a scheme whereby the water from the west flowing rivers could be channelized and equitably distributed."

2. The above directions were sought by the petitioner against the Central Government as well as against various State Governments, for effective management of the water resources in the country by nationalization and inter-linking of rivers from Ganga - Cauveri, Vaigai-Tambaravarmi up to Cape Kumari. According to him, as early as in 1834, Sir Arthur Cotton, who had constructed the Godavari and Krishna dams, suggested a plan called the `Arthur Cotton Scheme' to link the Ganga and Cauveri rivers. In 1930, Sir C.P. Ramaswamy Aiyar also suggested and supported such - a scheme. Thereafter, various political leaders of the country have supported the cause; but no such schemes have actually been implemented. It is the case of the petitioner that the Inter-State Water Disputes Act, 1956 (for short `the Act') and the River Boards Act, 1956 were enacted by the Parliament under Article 262 read with Entry 56 of List-I of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution of India, 1950 (hereafter, `the Constitution'). Due to reluctance of water-rich States, the National Water Development Agency (hereafter, `NWDA') has not been allowed to undertake detailed survey and it is argued that only by nationalization of the rivers, by the Government of India, this problem can be resolved to some extent. The petitioner had filed a writ before the High Court of Judicature at Madras, being Writ Petition No. 6207 of 1983, praying for various reliefs. This Writ Petition was disposed of without any effective orders by the High Court. Persisting with his effort, the petitioner earlier filed writ petitions before this Court, being Writ Petition (C) No. 75 of 1998 and Writ Petition (C) No. 15 of - 1999, praying inter alia for nationalized navigation and inter-linking of all the rivers in the country.

3. We must notice, to put the records straight, that on 29th September, 1994, a Bench of this Court took suo motu notice of a write-up that had appeared in the Hindustan Times newspaper, dated 18th July, 1994, titled "And quiet flows the maili Yamuna". Notice was issued to the Central Pollution Control Board, Municipal Corporation of Delhi, Irrigation and Flood Department of the Government of India, National Capital Territory of Delhi and the Delhi Administration. Since then, the writ petition is being continuously monitored by this Court, till date. During the pendency of this writ petition, I.A. No. 27 came to be filed, wherein the learned Amicus Curiae in that case referred to the address of Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam, the then President of India, on the eve of the Independence Day. This, inter alia, related to creating a network between various rivers in the country, with a view to deal with the paradoxical situation of floods in one part of the country and droughts in other parts. In other words, it related to the inter-linking of rivers - and taking of other water management measures. On 16th September, 2002, this Court, while considering the said I.A.,



























































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top