SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(SC) 423

R.M.LODHA, H.L.GOKHALE
Dropti Devi – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


JUDGMENT

R.M. Lodha, J.

The central issue in this petition under Article 32 of the Constitution concerns constitutional validity of Section 3(1) of Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (for short, ‘COFEPOSA’) to the extent it empowers the competent authority to make an order of detention against any person ‘with a view to preventing him from acting in any manner prejudicial to the conservation or augmentation of foreign exchange’.

2. It is necessary to state few material facts which have given rise to this petition. The first petitioner – Dropti Devi – is the mother of second petitioner – Raj Kumar Aggarwal. In respect of second petitioner an order of detention has been passed on September 23, 2009 by Smt. Rasheda Hussain, Joint Secretary to the Government of India, specially empowered under Section 3(1) of the COFEPOSA (as amended). The said order reads as follows :

“No. 673/02/2009-Cus. VIII

Government of India

Ministry of Finance

Department of Revenue

Central Economic Intelligence Bureau

COFEPOSA Unit

6th Floor, ‘B’ Wing, Janpath Bhawan,

Janpath, New Delhi – 110001

Dated 23rd September, 2009

ORDER

Whereas, I Smt. Rasheda Hussain, Joint Secretar





























































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top