SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(SC) 672

S. H. KAPADIA, MADAN B. LOKUR
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-II – Appellant
Versus
KRISHI UTPADAN MANDI SAMITI – Respondent


JUDGMENT

S.H. Kapadia, CJI.-Heard learned counsel on both sides.

2. Delay condoned.

3. Leave granted.

4. This batch of civil appeals has been filed by the Department. The question, which arises for determination in this batch of civil appeals, is as follows:

“Whether amounts transferred by the assessee to Mandi Parishad would constitute application of income for charitable purposes within the meaning of Section 11(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961?”

5. M/s. Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti, respondent-assessee herein, is a Market Committee incorporated and registered under the Uttar Pradesh Krishi Utpadan Mandi Adhiniyam, 1964 [“1964 Adhiniyam”, for short]. The assessee carries out its activities in accordance with Section 16 of 1964 Adhiniyam under which it is required to provide facilities for sale and purchase of specified agricultural produce in the Market Area. The Members of the said Market Committee consist of producers, brokers, agriculturists, traders, commission agents and arhatiyas. The source of income of the assessee is in the form of receipt collected as market fee from buyers and their agents, development cess on sale and purchase of agricultural products and licence f




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top