SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(SC) 1831

TARUN CHATTERJEE, AFTAB ALAM
BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD. – Appellant
Versus
DHANURDHAR CHAMPATIRAY – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Debasish Moitra, Ajit Kr. Pande - Appellant.
Parmanand Gaur - Respondent.

JUDGMENT

TARUN CHATTERJEE, J.

Leave granted.

These appeals by special leave have been filed against the orders dated 5th of January 2005 in A.R.B.P. Nos. 11, 12, 17, 18 and 28 of 2005 passed by the High Court of Orissa whereby the High Court had appointed Sh. Bibhudhendra Mishra, a Senior Advocate of the Orissa High Court as the sole arbitrator on the application of the respondent filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"). Since the parties and the subject-matter of the dispute are the same, we have clubbed all these appeals and the same are being decided analogously by this common judgment to avoid any confusion.

The relevant facts leading to the filing of these appeals as emerging from the records may be briefly stated as follows :

The parties herein entered into a contract pursuant to distinct notices inviting tender by BSNL [in short 'the appellant'] for the work of construction of 4 Nos. of Type - II, 2 Nos. Type - III and 1 No. of Type - IV Staff Quarters at Bhanjanagar of vertical extension to combined building at Aska of 3 Nos. of Type III, 3 Nos. of Type II and 4 K type T.E. building at Jankia and of vert























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top