P.SATHASIVAM, B.S.CHAUHAN
Haresh Mohandas Rajput – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
Judgment
Dr. B.S. CHAUHAN, J.
1. These appeals have been preferred against the impugned judgment and order dated 11.1.2008 in Criminal Appeal Nos.1020/2001 and 401/2002 of the High Court of Bombay in which the High Court has confirmed the order of conviction dated 19.9.2001 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune in Sessions Case No.41 of 2000 for the offences of rape and murder, however, altered the sentence of life imprisonment awarded by the Trial Court to death sentence while allowing the criminal appeal of the State for enhancement of punishment.
2. FACTS:
A. On 24.10.1999, Pooja, deceased, aged 10 years was playing on the road between her house and the house of the appellant at about 4 p.m. along with her brother Nitesh (PW.3) and sister. She was found missing by Nitesh (PW.3) who searched for her but in vain. Smt. Tara (PW.1) mother of Pooja, deceased, who had been away for work, on being informed came back and looked around but Pooja could not be traced. Smt. Tara (PW.1) reached the police station at 9.30 p.m. to lodge the First Information Report (hereinafter called the “FIR”). While Smt. Tara (PW.1) was still in the police station,Khushal (PW.10) son of the appellant
Krishnan v. State represented by Inspector of Police
Sharad Birdhichand Sarda v. State of Maharashtra
Paramjeet Singh @ Pamma v. State of Uttarakhand
Wakkar v. State of Uttar Pradesh
Mohd. Mannan @ Abdul Mannan v. State of Bihar
Inspector of Police, Tamil Nadu v. John David
SK. Yusuf v. State of West Bengal
Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab
Machhi Singh v. State of Punjab
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.