K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, DIPAK MISRA
Jeetu @ Jitendera – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
Judgment :-
Dipak Misra, J.
Leave granted.
2. The present appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence passed by the High Court of Chattisgarh at Bilaspur in Criminal Appeal No. 639 of 2009 whereby the High Court affirmed the conviction of the appellant for offences punishable under Sections 147 and 327/149 of the Indian Penal Code (for short “the I.P.C.”), but reduced the sentence from three years rigorous imprisonment on the second score to one year and maintained the sentence of rigorous imprisonment for three months in respect of the offence on the first score i.e. Section 147, I.P.C. Be it noted, both the sentences were directed to be concurrent.
3. The facts as has been exposited are that on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged by the informant, Aarif Hussain, PW-10, at 11.50 P.M. on 16.4.2008 alleging that about 10.00 P.M. when he was going towards Telibandha P.S., the accused persons met him near Telibandha chowk and demanded Rs.500/- for liquor and on his refusal they took him towards Awanti Vihar railway crossing in an auto rickshaw and assaulted him, Crime Case No. 129/2008 was registered under Sections 327, 366 and 323 read with
Govinda Kadtuji Kadam v. The State of Maharashtra
Sita Ram v. The State of Uttar Pradesh
Thippaswamy v. State of Karnataka
State of Uttar Pradesh v. Chandrika
Madanlal Ramchandra Daga v. State of Maharashtra
Murlidhar Meghraj Loya v. State of Maharashtra
Ganeshmal Jashraj v. Govt. of Gujarat
Dilip S. Dahanukar v. Kotak Mahindra Co. Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.