HINDU vs STATE OF TAMIL NADU - 1987 Supreme(SC) 823

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

1987 Supreme(SC) 823

M. N. VENKATACHALIAH, R. S. PATHAK
HINDU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF TAMIL NADU – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
A. T. M. Sampath, Advocate, for the appellant.
R. Mohan and Ayyam Perumal, Advocates, for the respondent.

ORDER

In view of the law laid down by this Court in C.A. No. 1633 of 1974 [Indian Express (P.) Ltd. v. State of Tamil Nadu printed at page 474 supra] there is no force in this appeal. The appeal is dismissed a accordingly. No costs.

Appeal dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

1987 Supreme(SC) 823

M. N. VENKATACHALIAH, R. S. PATHAKHINDU – AppellantVersusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU – Respondent

M. N. VENKATACHALIAH, R. S. PATHAK
HINDU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF TAMIL NADU – Respondent