Back
Supreme Court of India
S.H. KAPADIA, CJI., AFTAB ALAM & SWATANTER KUMAR, JJ.
State of Andhra Pradesh & Others
Versus
Obulapuram Mining Company Private Limited & Others
SLPs.(C).Nos. 7366-67 of 2010 with W.P.(C).No. 562 of 2009
Decided On : 04-05-2012
Judgment :
In re: CRC Report dated 20-4-2012
We have heard Mr. V. Giri, learned Senior Counsel for Mr. B.S. Yeddyurappa; Mr. C.S. Vaidyanathan, learned Senior Counsel for M/s. Jindal Steels and Mr. C.U. Singh, learned Senior Counsel for M/s. South West Mining Limited from 12.55 p.m. till 1.55 p.m.
Hearing concluded. Orders reserved.
The learned counsel undertake to give common compilation by 5.00 p.m. tomorrow i.e. 5-5-2012.
In re: CEC Report dated 27-4-2012
The report of the Central Empowered Committee dated 27-4-2012, will be taken up in due course. However, in the meantime, we direct the Lokayukta, Karnataka; State of Karnataka and Customs Department to preserve documents, which are specifically referred and relatable to the CEC Report dated 27-4-2012. The Central Empowered Committee will furnish the list of documents to these authorities.
In re; Rehabilitation and reclamation
In continuation of this Court’s order dated 20-4-2012 (State of
A.P. v. Obulapuram Mining Co.(P).Ltd., (2013) 8 SCC 216), we clarify that with regard to the implementation of rehabilitation and reclamation plan, liberty is given to the Central Empowered Committee to take all requisite/necessary steps.
In re; Response in IA No. 7 of 2011 in W.P.(C).No. 562 of 2009
Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, we grant the following prayer:
“(d) Alternatively to (c) above, the manganese ore mined by SANDUR in Mining Leases Nos. 2580 and 2581 be sold through e-auction but the captive consumption and supply to its subsidiary companies may be exempted from e-auction.”
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
