SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(SC) 1567

K. G. BALAKRISHNAN, ARIJIT PASAYAT, S. H. KAPADIA
T. N. Godavarman Thirumulpad – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Harish N. Salve (Amicus Curiae), Senior Advocate (Siddhartha Chowdhury (Amicus Curiae), P.K. Manohar,) Advocates.
For the Respondents:G.E. Vahanvati, Solicitor General (Harish Beedran, H. Baruah, P. Paremeswaran, Mariarputham), Advocates.

Judgment :

It is brought to our notice that 18 temporary working permissions have been given for mining leases by the Ministry Environment and Forests (MoEF) in the State of Goa between 1-9-2007 to 30-11-2007. The learned amicus curiae points out that in these 18 cases opinion of CEC was not sought for nor was the matter brought to the notice of this Court and the entire mining area comes within the forest area of Goa.

2. The learned Solicitor General appearing for MoEF may give its response within a week. Post the matter on 14-12-2007.

All these parties – V.M. Salgaocar & Bros. (P). Ltd., Halder Kassim Khan, V.S. Dempo & Co. Ltd., Rajesh Timblo, Badrudin Mavani, Sova, M.S. Talaulicar & Bros., Hiru Bambo Gauns, Sociedade Tmmblo Irmaog, Emco Goa Ltd., G.N. Agarwal, and A.V.S. Velingkar be impleaded as respondents and notice be given to these parties who are granted temporary working permissions. Till such time these respondents are directed not to carry out any work under the temporary working permission.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top