ANIL R.DAVE, DIPAK MISRA
S. F. ENGINEER – Appellant
Versus
METAL BOX INDIA LTD. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dipak Misra, J.:-
1. Leave granted.
2. This appeal, by special leave, by the landlord arises out of and is directed against the judgment and order dated 12.8.2010 of the Bombay High Court passed in Civil Revision Application No. 355 of 2010, allowing the respondent-tenants’ appeal and – in reversal of the concurrent findings of the courts below that there was an unauthorized subletting – dismissing appellant’s application under 13(1)(e) of the Bombay Rent Act, 1947 for an order for grant of possession.
3. The appellant-plaintiff, owner of the suit premises, i.e., Flat Nos. 201 and 204 on second floor of the building known as “Marlow” and two garages Nos. 7 and 8 on the ground floor of the suit building situate at 62-B, Pochkhanwala Road, Worli, Mumbai, instituted RAE No. 45/84 of 1997 for eviction of the first respondent (defendant No. 1) and its former employee, the respondent No. 2 (defendant No. 2). For the sake of convenience, the parties hereinafter shall be referred to as per the rank in the suit.
4. The case of the plaintiff in the court below was that the defendant No. 1 was a tenant under the plaintiff on a consolidated monthly rent of Rs.1075/-. The premises, as s
Bharat Sales Ltd. v. Life Insurance Corporation of India
Associated Hotels of India Ltd. v. S.B. Sardar Ranjit Singh
Smt. Rajbir Kaur v. M/s. S. Chokesiri and Co.
Dipak Banerjee v. Smt. Lilabati Chakraborty
Bhairab Chandra Nandan v. Ranadhir Chandra Dutta
M/s. Shalimar Tar Products Ltd. v. H.C. Sharma
United Bank of India v. Cooks and Kelvey Properties (P) Limited
Shama Prashant Raje v. Ganpatrao
Celina Coelho Pereira (Ms) v. Ulhas Mahabaleshwar Kholkar
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.