SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(SC) 338

P. SATHASIVAM, RANJAN GOGOI, N. V. RAMANA
RAMILABEN CHINUBHAI PARMAR – Appellant
Versus
NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

N.V. RAMANA, J.

The appellants herein are the claimants who filed a petition before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ahmedabad claiming an amount of Rs. 40.00 lakhs as compensation on the ground that the sole breadwinner of their family, who was 46 years old, had died in a road accident. The Tribunal, relying upon the oral as well as documentary evidence, took the income of the deceased at Rs.15,000/ – p.m. and considering his age at 46, applied the multiplier 12. In addition to that, the Tribunal granted Rs.50,000/ – as conventional amount, and finally awarded Rs.22,10,000/ – as compensation to the appellants with interest @ 9% p.a.

2. Aggrieved thereby, the respondent – Insurance Company preferred First Appeal No. 301 of 2003 before the High Court. The appellants herein also filed Cross Objection No. 107 of 2006 in the said appeal seeking enhancement. After hearing the Insurance Company as well as claimants, the High Court determined the net salary of the deceased as Rs.14,000/ – p.m. by applying the multiplier 8, arrived at the compensation towards loss of dependency as Rs.13,44,000/ – . It further added Rs.25,000/ – for loss of estate and Rs.15,000/ – for loss of conso






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top