SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(SC) 708

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
R.M. LODHA, CJI., MADAN B. LOKUR & KURIAN JOSEPH, JJ.
Manohar Lal Sharma – Appellant
Versus
The Principle Secretary & Others – Respondents
Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 120 of 2012 With Writ Petition (Civil) No. 463 of 2012 With Writ Petition (Civil) No. 515 of 2012 And Writ Petition (Civil) No. 283 of 2013
Decided On : 24-09-2014

Important Point—Relief to be granted in a case always looks to future.

Headnote:(A) Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957—Section 11Mineral Concession Rules, 1960—Rule 34Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1973—Section 3(3)(a)(iii)—Coal Blocks—Mass illegality in allocation—All parties likely to be adversely affected were given hearing—Apex Court has taken assistance of one committee or other in several cases but that was where inquiry was required to be conducted and Apex Court was obviously not in a position to conduct any such inquiry—No such occasion or situation has arisen in present case to necessitate appointment of committee—Question of appointing a committee simply does not arise—These proceedings look to future in that by highlighting wrong, it is expected that Government will not deal with natural resources that belong to country as if they belong to a few individuals who can fritter them away at their sweet will—Allotment of 42 out of these 46 coal blocks quashed—However, cancellation will take effect with effect from 31st March, 2015—Scrutiny by CBI in respect of allotment of another 12 coal blocks will continue. (Paras 27, 28, 30, 32, 33, 37, 39, 40 and 41)

       (B) Natural Justice—Observance—Principles of natural justice, though universal, must be realistically and pragmatically applied—Relief to be granted in a case always looks to future—It is generally corrective and in some cases it is compensatory. (Paras 16 to 18)

       (2002) 4 SCC 388; (1988) 4 SCC 226—Relied.

       Facts of Case—Point in issue centered around massive illegalities in allocation of coal blocks to favorite and chosen and consequent losses cause to state exchequer. Following public uproar matter was taken up by Court and tainted allocations were cancelled.

       Findings of Court—Process of allotment cannot be reopened collaterally through the appointment of a committee. This would virtually amount to nullifying the judgment. The process is a continuous thread that runs through all the allotments. Since it was fatally flawed, beneficiaries of the flawed process must suffer the consequences thereof and the appointment of a committee would really amount to permitting a body to examine correctness of the judgment. This is clearly impermissible.

       

Judgment :-

1. On 25th August, 2014 judgment was delivered in these cases and it was held, inter alia, that the allotment of coal blocks made by the Screening Committee of the Government of India, as also the allotments made through the Government dispensation route are arbitrary and illegal. Since the conclusion arrived at would have potentially had far-reaching consequences, on which submissions were not made when the case was heard, the question of what should be the consequences of the declaration was left open for hearing.

2. The relevant paragraphs of the judgment dated 25th August, 2014 read as follows:-

“155. The allocation of coal blocks through Government dispensation route, however laudable the object may be, also is illegal since it is impermissible as per the scheme of the CMN Act. No State Government or public sector undertakings of the State Governments are eligible for mining coal for commercial use. Since allocation of coal is permissible only to those categories under Section 3(3) and (4), the joint venture arrangement with ineligible firms is also impermissible. Equally, there is also no question of any consortium/leader/association in allocation. Only an undertaking satisfying the eligibility criteria referred to in Section 3(3) of the CMN Act, viz., which has a unit engaged in the production of iron and steel and generation of power, washing of coal obtained from mine or production of cement, is entitled to the allocation in addition to Central Government, a Central Government company or a Central Government corporation.

156. In this context, it is worthwhile to note that the 1957 Act has been amended introducing Section 11-A w.e.f. 13.02.2012. As per the said amendment, the grant of reconnaissance permit or prospecting licence or mining lease in respect of an area containing coal or lignite can be made only through selection through auction by competitive bidding even among the eligible entities under Section 3(3)(a)(iii), referred to above. However, Government companies, Government corporations or companies or corporations, which have been awarded power projects on the basis of competitive bids for tariff (including Ultra Mega Power Projects) have been exempted of allocation in favour of them is not meant to be through the competitive bidding process.

157. As we have already found that the allocations made, both under the Screening Committee route and the Government dispensation route, are arbitrary and illegal, what should be the consequences, is the issue which remains to be tackled. We are of the view that, to this limited extent, the matter requires further hearing.”

3. Accordingly, we heard several learned counsels appearing for a very large number of interveners, impleadment applicants and State Governments. Substantive submissions were made, amongst others, by the Coal Producers Association, the Independent Power Producers Association of India and the Sponge Iron Manufacturers Association. These associations had also been heard on an earlier occasion well before judgment was delivered on 25th August, 2014.

4. For the purposes of these “consequence proceedings”, the Union of India filed an affidavit dated 8th September, 2014. It is stated in the affidavit that coal is actually being mined from 40 coal blocks listed in Annexure I to the affidavit. This list includes two coal blocks allotted to an Ultra Mega Power Projects (Sasan Power Ltd. [UMPP] allotted the coal blocks Moher and Moher Amroli Extension). Coal blocks allotted to UMPPs have not been disturbed in the judgment. The list of the 40 coal blocks is attached to this order as Annexure 1.

5. In addition to the above 40 coal blocks, it is stated in the affidavit that 6 more coal blocks are ready for extraction of coal in 2014-15 and this list is Annexure II to the affidavit. These 6 coal blocks have obtained the Mine Opening Permission from the Coal Co


















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top