H. L. DATTU, S. A. BOBDE, A. M. SAPRE
KSL & INDUSTRIES LTD. – Appellant
Versus
ARIHANT THREADS LTD. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
S. A. BOBDE, J.
1. This appeal is placed before us by way of a reference, made by a two-Judge Bench of this Court, C.K. Thakker and Altamas Kabir, JJ. which heard the matter on an earlier occasion and held that the appeal deserves to be allowed and that the Judgment and Order passed by the High Court is liable to be set aside. In view of a difference of opinion having arisen on the interpretation of Section 34 of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 (hereinafter referred to as the 'RDDB' Act) the matter has been referred for decision to this Bench by the Hon’ble Chief Justice of India.
2. The present appeal is preferred by KSL & Industries Ltd. (`appellant' for short) against the final Judgment and Order dated 23.02.06 passed by the Delhi High Court in Writ Petition Nos. 2041-2042 OF 2006. The High Court set aside the Order passed by the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Delhi (`DRAT' for short) and held that in view of the bar contained in Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 (hereafter referred to as `SICA') no recovery proceedings could be effected against Respondent No. 1 (M/s. Arihant Threads L
Kailash Nath Agarwal v. Pradeshiya Industrial & Investment Corporation of U.P. Ltd.
Ram Narain v. Simla Banking & Industrial Co. Ltd.
Maharashtra Tubes Ltd. v. State Industrial & Investment Corpn. Of Maharashtra Ltd.
Reserve Bank of India v. Peerless General Finance and Investment Co. Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.