A.K.SIKRI, ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
SHABINA ABRAHAM – Appellant
Versus
COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE & CUSTOMS – Respondent
JUDGMENT
R.F. Nariman, J.
1. “Nothing is certain except death and taxes.” Thus spake Benjamin Franklin in his letter of November 13, 1789 to Jean Baptiste Leroy. To tax the dead is a contradiction in terms. Tax laws are made by the living to tax the living. What survives the dead person is what is left behind in the form of such person’s property. This appeal raises questions as to whether the dead person’s property, in the form of his or her estate, can be taxed without the necessary machinery provisions in a tax statute. The precise question that arises in the present case is whether an assessment proceeding under the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, can continue against the legal representatives/estate of a sole proprietor/manufacturer after he is dead. The facts of the case are as follows.
2. One Shri George Varghese was the sole proprietor of Kerala Tyre and Rubber Company Limited. By October 1985, this proprietary concern had stopped manufacture and production of tread rubber. By a show cause notice dated 12.6.1987, for the period January 1983 to December 1985, it was alleged that the assessee had manufactured and cleared tread rubber from the factory premises by suppressi
State of Punjab v. M/s Jullunder Vegetables Syndicate
Khushi Ram Behari Lal & Co. v. Assessing Authority, Sangrur
Additional Tahsildar, Raipur v. Gendalal
M/s. Murarilal Mahabir Prasad v. Shri B.R. Vad
Yeshwantrao v. The Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Bangalore
C.A. Abraham v. The Income-Tax Officer, Kottayam
The State of Tamil Nadu v. M.K. Kandaswami
Commissioner of Sales Tax Commissioner, Uttar Pradesh v. Modi Sugar Mills
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.