SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(SC) 756

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
H.L. DATTU, CJI., FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA, PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE, ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE, UDAY UMESH LALIT, JJ.
UNION OF INDIA – PETITIONERS
VERSUS
V. SRIHARAN @ MURUGAN AND ORS. – RESPONDENTS
WRIT PETITION (CRL.)NO.48 OF 2014 WITH WRIT PETITION (CRL.) NO.185 OF 2014 WITH WRIT PETITION (CRL.) NO.150 OF 2014 WITH WRIT PETITION CRL.) NO.66 OF 2014 AND WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1215 OF 2011
Decided On : 23-07-2015

Headnote:Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – Sections 432 and 433 – Remission of sentence – Restraint imposed by Supreme Court – To continue where life sentence has been awarded till the end of his life without remission or commutation; where restraint has been put on remission or commutation till the convict completes a fixed term such as 20 years or 25 years or like; where no application for remission or commutation was preferred, or considered suo motu by the concerned State Governments/authorities; where the investigation was not conducted by any Central Investigating Agency like the Central Bureau of Investigation; or where the life sentence is under any central law or under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 or any other similar offence – Subject to the final orders that may be passed – However, the President of India (under Article 72) and the Governors of the States (under Article 161) of the Constitution of India not prevented from exercising their power(s). (Para 4, 5, 7)

       Facts of the case:

       This case pertains to Supreme Court order dated 9th July, 2014 restraining the State Governments from exercising their powers of remission and commutation of sentence under Sections 432 and 433 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 to life convicts.

       

ORDER

WRIT PETITION (CRL.)NO.48 OF 2014:

1. Vide order dated 9th July, 2014, we had restrained the State Governments from exercising their powers of remission and commutation of sentence under Sections 432 and 433 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 to life convicts. The relevant paragraph of the order passed by this Court reads as under :

“In the meanwhile, the State Governments are restrained from exercising power of remission to life convicts”.

2. We had issued notice to all the State Governments through their standing counsel.

3. After hearing the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the respective State Governments for some time, we are of the considered view that our order dated 09.07.2014 requires to be modified.

4. Accordingly, we modify our order dated 09.07.2014, whereby we had restrained the State Governments from exercising power of remission or commutation to life convicts. The said order dated 09.07.2014 shall only apply to cases :

1) where life sentence has been awarded specifying that :

(a) the convict shall undergo life sentence till the end of his life without remission or commutation;

(b) the convict shall not be released by granting remission or commutation till he completes a fixed term such as 20 years or 25 years or like.

ii) where no application for remission or commutation was preferred, or considered suo motu by the concerned State Governments/authorities.

iii) where the investigation was not conducted by any Central Investigating Agency like the Central Bureau of Investigation.

iv) where the life sentence is under any central law or under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 or any other similar offence.

5. However, we clarify that the President of India in exercise of his powers under Article 72 of the Constitution of India and the Governors of the States in exercise of their powers under Article 161 of the Constitution of India are not prevented from exercising their power(s), insofar as the cases referred to in Para 4 above are concerned.

6. We further make it clear that this order shall not be applicable to the respondents in Writ Petition (Crl.) No.48 of 2014.

7. It is also clarified that this order is subject to the final orders that may be passed by us while answering the Referral order.

8. The order passed by us today shall be communicated by the Registry of this Court to all the State Governments and Union Territories.

9. Accordingly, Criminal Miscellaneous Petition Nos.21421 of 2014, 7510 of 2015 and 11179 of 2015 are disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top