M.Y.EQBAL, ARUN MISHRA
A. N. Sachdeva (dead) by LRs. – Appellant
Versus
Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak – Respondent
JUDGMENT
ARUN MISHRA, J.
1. The question involved in the present appeals is whether services rendered by the appellants in Kurukshetra University/Punjab University is qualifying service for the purpose of pension and can be added to the services rendered by them in the respondent no.1, i.e. Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak (hereinafter called “M.D. University”).
2. The appellants are receiving pension after their retirement from M.D. University, however, it is confined to the services rendered by them in the same university. Deceased A.N. Sachdeva and Ram Parshad Saini were appointed in Punjab University. R.K. Tuteja, petitioner no.3 and Prem Kumar were appointed as Lecturer and Clerk respectively. They were appointed without any break in M.D. University.
3. A.N. Sachdeva, since deceased was appointed as Steno-Typist in Punjab University on 7.8.1961, thereafter as Private Secretary to Vice-Chancellor in M.D. University on 1.5.1976, promoted as Deputy Registrar in August, 1988 and retired from the service of M.D. University on 31.12.2000.
Ram Prashad Saini after rendering services from 16.11.1962 to 14.1.1975 in Punjab University was appointed as Asistant in Kurukshetra Unive
M.C. Dhingra v. Union of India
State of Punjab v. Justice S.S. Dewan (Retd.)
State of Rajasthan v. Prem Raj
Union of India v. K.G. Radhakrishna Panickar
V. Kasturi v. Managing Director, State Bank of India
John Vallamattom v. Union of India
State Bank of India v. L. Kannaiah
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.