SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 1335

A. S. ANAND, R. C. LAHOTI
DILIP K. BASU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF W. B. – Respondent


ORDER

1. In Dilip K. Basu case this Court gave certain basic as 11 requirements, in addition to the safeguards provided under the Code of Criminal Procedure and other laws, to be followed in all cases of arrest or detention, till legal provisions are made in that behalf, as a measure to prevent and in any case to reduce incidents of custodial violence. As many as 11 requirements were laid down in that order dated 18-12-1996.

2. Subsequently, on an application filed by the learned amicus, to assess whether those directions were being respected and complied with by various States and Union Territories, we issued notice to all the States and Union Territories calling upon them to file affidavits and state in a tabular form whether each of those 11 “requirements” was being complied with and if not, the reasons for non-compliance. Almost all the States and Union Territories have filed their affidavits. Charts have also been filed indicating which of the directions have been complied with and the deficiency in complying with other requirements.

3. Dr. A.M. Singhvi, learned amicus submits that since the affidavits from almost all the States and Union Territories have now been received, he



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top