DIPAK MISRA, N.V.RAMANA
State of Jharkhand – Appellant
Versus
Tata Steel Ltd. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Dipak Misra, J.
M/s. Tata Steel Limited, the 1st respondent herein, had established a manufacturing unit for production of HRP, rounds, structural and other iron and steel products in Dhanbad situated in erstwhile Bihar. The State of Bihar had on 22.12.1995 formulated an industrial policy for tax exemption and/or deferment to such industrial units which started production between 01.09.1995 and 31.08.2000.
The said policy was issued in exercise of power conferred by Section 23A of the Bihar Finance Act, 1981 (for short, “the 1981 Act”) and the purpose of framing the policy was industrial growth of the State. The policy stipulated that such industrial units should have the registration certificate indicating that the unit was eligible to have the benefits of the policy. The policy was issued with a view to create an atmosphere conducive for growth of industries and optimum utilisation of the natural resources available in the designated/stipulated area. As is evident, by the said policy, the Government intended to attract investors from various parts of the country to invest in the identified areas. The major incentive under the policy, apart from others, included eight year
Telangana Steel Industries v. State of A.P.
Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. v. State of Jharkhand
Hansraj Gordhandas v. H.H. Dave, Assistant Collector of Central Excise & Customs, Surat
Utkal Contractors and Joinery Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Orissa
M/s Doypack Systems Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India
Mahadeo Prasad Bais (Dead) v. Income-Tax Officer ‘A’ Ward, Gorakhpur
Oxford University Press v. Commissioner of Income Tax
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.