SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(SC) 1241

State of Kerala – Appellant
Versus
Joseph @ Baby – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant in Crl. A. 1535-1560/2005 :Mr. K. Padmanabhan Nair, Senior Advocate, Mr. Ramesh Babu M.R. and Mr. B.R. Mohan Kumar, Advocates.
For the Appellant in Crl. A. 1562-1567, 1578-1586/2005 :Mr. Chander Udai Singh, Senior Advocate, Ms. Rukhsana Choudhury, Ms. Anila George, Mr. Ravindra S. Garia and Ms. Charu Singhal, Advocate.
For the Appellant in Crl. A. 1568-1569, 1587, 1570-1571, 1573-1577/2005) :Mr. Anand Grover, Senior Advocate, Ms. Anila George, Ms. Rukshana Choudhury, Ms. Jhuma Sen and Mr. Mihir Samson, Advocates.
For the Intervenor :Mr. V. Giri, Senior Advocate, Mr. V.K. Biju, Mr. Vipin Nair, Mr. P.B. Suresh for M/s. Temple Law Firm, Advocates.
For the Respondent in Crl. A. 1535-1560/2005)(Crl. A. 1562-1587/2005):Mr. Altaf Ahamed, Senior Advocate, Dr. S. Gopakumaran Nair, Senior Advocate, Mr. T.G. Narayanan Nair, Mr. P. Parameswaran, Mr. K.N. Madhusoodhanan, Mr. Roy Abraham, Ms. Reena Roy and Ms. Seema Jain, Advocates.
For the Respondent in Crl. A. 1535-1560/2005):Mr. Renjith B., Ms. Lekshmi N. Kamal, Mr. S.C.V. Vimal Pani, Mr. Himinder Lal, Mr. M.T. George, Ms. Bina Madhavan for M/s. Lawyer'S Knit and Co, Advocates.

ORDER :

1. This batch of appeals arise out of a common judgment dated 20th January, 2005 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Kerala.

2. The facts relevant for disposal of these appeals very briefly are that for the occurrence of alleged kidnapping, wrongful confinement for 40 days, rape and gang rape of a minor girl, in all 40 accused were tried in Sessions Case No. 187 of 1999 and one accused was tried in Sessions Case No. 241 of 2001 before a Special Court. The Special Court delivered the judgment in Sessions Case No. 187 of 1999 convicting 35 of the accused under Sections 120B, 363, 365, 366-A, 368, 376(1) and 376(2)(g), Indian Penal Code and by a separate and subsequent judgment, the Special Court convicted the only accused in the Sessions Case No. 241 of 2001 under Sections 120B, 365, 363, 366-A, 368, 376(2)(g), 372 and 392, Indian Penal Code The respondents-accused filed separate Criminal Appeals before the High Court and the High Court, by the impugned common judgment, took into account the evidence adduced in Sessions Case No. 241 of 2001 in which only one accused was tried, and on that basis, set aside the conviction of not only that lone accused in Sessions Ca











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top