T. S. THAKUR, A. K. SIKRI, R. BANUMATHI
CENTRE FOR PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
A.K. SIKRI, J.
The petitioner herein, viz., Centre for Public Interest Litigation, is a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860. It claims that the very purpose for which this society was established was to bring causes to the Superior Courts, which are of grave public importance, by way of public interest litigation in an organised manner. In the present writ petition filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner challenges the decision of the Government of India, taken sometime in March 2013, allowing voice telephony to respondent No. 2 (Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd.) on payment of Rs.1,658 crores entry fee. Allegation of the petitioner is that the aforesaid amount at which the license for voice telephony is granted to respondent No. 2 is a pittance inasmuch as in normal course grant of this license would have fetched a whopping sum of Rs.25000 crores approximately. This insinuation is based upon a draft report of the Comptroller an
G. Sundarrajan v. Union of India
Presidential Reference on the issue of Alienation of Natural Resources
Centre for Public Interest Litigation v. Union of India
Jal Mahal Resorts (P) Ltd. v. K.P. Sharma
Narmada Bachao Andolan v. Union of India
Federation of Railway Officers Assn. v. Union of India
Prag Ice & Oil Mills v. Union of India and Nav Bharat Oil Mills v. Union of India
Peerless General Finance and Investment Co. Limited v. Reserve Bank of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.