SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(SC) 554

FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA, S.A.BOBDE
Veerendra Kr. Gautam – Appellant
Versus
Karuna Nidhan Upadhyay – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants :- A. Sharan, Sr.Adv., Amit Anand Tiwari, Abhinav Raghuvanshi, Raj Singh Rana, Pankaj Kumar Singh, Makrand Pratap Singh, Ms. Rinku Mishra, Ms. Kamakshi S. Mehlwal, Manoj K. Mishra, Sandeep Kr. Dwivedi, Umesh Dubey, Ms. Anu Gupta, Jaideep Gupta, Sr.Adv., S.D. Singh, Ms. Bharti Tyagi, Rahul Kumar, Jitender Singh, Ranbir Singh Yadav, Puran Mal Saini, Ms. Anzu K. Varkey, Pati Raj Yadav, Sumit Kumar, Garvesh Kabra, Sanjay Kumar Visen, Manendra Dubey, Sanjay Kumar Visen, Mrs. V.D. Khanna, Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair, Advocates.
For the Respondents:- Sanjay Kumar Visen, Ashok Kumar Sharma, Ms. Pooja Dhar, Gaurav Agrawal, M.R. Shamshad, Andleeb Naqui, Gaurav Shrivastva, Shibashish Misra, Gaurav Agrawal, C.D. Singh, Ms. Sakshi Kakkar, Sandeepan Pathak, Anupam Lal Das, Prashant Kumar, Advocates.

JUDGMENT

Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla, J. - These appeals are directed against the common judgment of the Division Bench of the High of Allahabad dated 23.04.2012 in Writ Application No.34198 of 2008 etc. batch, by which, the Division Bench dealt with the challenge made to the selection dated 15.05.2007, to the post of Principals in the Degree Colleges in the State of Uttar Pradesh and the selection dated 30.06.2008 and 02.07.2008 to the post of Principals in different Post Graduate Colleges also in the State of Uttar Pradesh. While dealing with the said challenges made, the Division Bench ultimately set aside the select list dated 30.06.2008 and 02.07.2008 as well as the select list dated 15.05.2007 in respect of the Principals to P.G Colleges and degree colleges respectively by allowing W.P.No.34198 of 2008 along with connected writ petitions of Group-I and writ petition No.44358 of 2007. By the very same impugned judgment the Division Bench also dealt with another writ petition in W.P.No.70062 of 2006, by which, some of the selected candidates applied for Mandamus to give effect



















































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top