SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(SC) 594

T. S. THAKUR, R. BANUMATHI, UDAY UMESH LALIT
Electrotherm (India) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Patel Vipulkumar Ramjibhai – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Uday Umesh Lalit, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. This appeal challenges the judgment and order dated 11.05.2012 passed by the High Court of Gujarat allowing Special Civil Application No.5986/2010 setting aside the Environmental Clearance dated 27.01.2010 and directing that the operations of the entire plant of the Appellant be stopped and that the operations could be continued only after fresh Environmental Clearance was accorded in its favour by the Ministry of Environment and Forests and Union of India.

3. The Environment Impact Assessment Notification dated 27.01.1994 issued by the Central Government in exercise of powers conferred by sub-section(1) and Clause V of sub-section(2) of Section 3 of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 read with Clause(d) of sub-rule(2) of Rule 5 of the Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986 stipulated inter alia that in case of expansion or modernization of any activity, if pollution load exceeded the existing one or the new project was listed in Schedule I to the said Notification, such activity would not be undertaken unless the Environmen















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top