PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE, AMITAVA ROY
Saddik @ Lalo Gulam Hussein Shaikh – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Pinaki Chandra Ghose, J.
1. These appeals by special leave, have been directed against the judgment and order dated 24.10.2008 passed by the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad in Criminal Appeal Nos. 117 of 2007 and 2274 of 2006 respectively, whereby the High Court dismissed the criminal appeals filed by the appellants herein and confirmed their conviction and sentence for various offences punishable under Section 302 read with Sections 143, 147, 148, 323 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [hereinafter referred to as “IPC”].
2. The brief facts necessary to dispose of these appeals are that on 04.03.2005 at about 8:00 p.m., one Rajubhai Jesingbhai Vasava(PW1), along with Rajubhai Ramubhai Vasava (deceased), Rakeshkumar Manharbhai Patel (PW2) and Prajeshkumar Ishwarbhai Patel (PW3), four persons, had gone to Amboli Cross-road, on two motorcycles, from the house of Rakeshbhai Tailor at Kholwad, for eating Biryani and after reaching at the Lari of Saddik @ Lalbhai Gulam Hussain Shaikh of Village Kathor (Accused No.1), they ordered four plates of Biriyani. But they were served only three plates of Biriyani with chicken pieces and one plate of Biriyani without chicken pieces. When Ac
Ganga Kumar Srivastava v. The State of Bihar
State of U.P. v. Virendra Prasad
State of Maharashtra v. Kashi Rao
Akbar Sheikh v. State of West Bengal
Rachamreddi Cheena Reddy v. State of A.P.
Gangadhar Behera v. State of Orissa
Daya Kishan v. State of Haryana
Sikandar Singh v. State of Bihar
Ramachandran v. State Of Kerala
Bikau Pandey v. State of Bihar
Abu Thakir v. State of Tamil Nadu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.