SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(SC) 1025

T. S. THAKUR, A. M. KHANWILKAR, D. Y. CHANDRACHUD
Board of Control For Cricket – Appellant
Versus
Cricket Aasociation of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the C.A. No. 10425 of 2014 :- Gopal Subramanium, Sr.Adv.(A.C.), Ms. Radha Rangaswamy, Ms. Ranjeeta Rohatgi, Abhinav Mukerji, Advocates.
For the (CA No. 4236 of 2014) :- Gagan Gupta, Advocate.
For the (CA No. 1155 of 2015) :- Vikas Mehta, Advocate.
For the Respondents:- Vikas Mehta, Ms. Radha Rangaswamy, Ms. Ranjeeta Rohatgi, Abhinav Mukerji, Ms. Neela Gokhale, Ms. Kamakshi S. Mehlwal, Mukesh Kumar Maroria, Shreekant N. Terdal, Advocates.
For the (I.A. No. 10 of 2016) :- Anshuman Ashok, Amit A. Pai, Venkita Subramoniam T. R., V. K. Biju, Ms. Liz Mathew, Amol Chitale, Nirnimesh Dube, M. Yogesh Kanna, S. Nithya Srinivasan, Ms. Manju Sharma, Vikas Singh Jangra, Ms. Pooja Dhar, Praveen Swarup, Anish R. Shah, Shree Pal Singh, Mrs Lalita Kaushik, Raghavendra S. Srivatsa, E. C. Agrawala, A. S. Bhasme, Ms. Sonia Mathur, Gaurav Sharma, Gagan Gupta, Ms. Rashmi Singh, Chirag M. Shroff, Hari Shankar, Vipin Nair, Rahul Pratap, Mishra Saurab, Deeptakirti Verma, Ms. Pragya Baghel, Ms. Tamali Wad, Gaurav Sharma, Advocates.

ORDER

Heard in part.

2. Post on 17.10.2016 at 2.00 p.m. for continuation.

3. By our Order dated 18.07.2016, we had while accepting the report submitted by Justice Lodha Committee and the recommendations made therein requested the Committee to supervise the transition from the old to the new system in the wake of the reforms proposed by the Committee. We had hoped that this transition will be completed within a period of four months or at best six months from the date of the order and requested the Committee headed by Justice Lodha to draw appropriate timelines for the implementation of the recommendations and supervise the process. We had, at the same time, directed the BCCI and all concerned to co-operate with the Committee and to act in aid of its directives. Anticipating possible impediments in the process of implementation we had reserved liberty to the Committee to seek appropriate directions from this Court by filing a status report in that regard. Justice Lodha Committee has now submitted a status report in which it has set out the developments that have taken place after 18th July, 2016 till the date of the submission of the report. The BCCI has responded to the status report






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top