SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(SC) 582

ASHOK BHUSHAN, DEEPAK GUPTA
SAURABH DWIVEDI – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Deepak Gupta, J.

Applications for permission to file special leave petitions are allowed. Applications for impleadment/intervention are also allowed.

2. Leave granted in all the special leave petitions.

3. By this order we are disposing of all the aforesaid civil appeals as well as interlocutory application(s) relating to the State of Uttar Pradesh in Writ Petition (C) No. 76 of 2015. Keeping in view the urgent nature of the dispute, the appeals and the interlocutory application (s) relating to the State of Uttar Pradesh in the Writ Petition (C) No.76 of 2015 are taken up for final hearing with the consent of the parties.

4. Two questions arise for decision in these cases:

(i) Whether the High Court was justified in setting aside the institutional preference in the Aligarh Muslim University (for short “AMU”) and Banaras Hindu University (for short “BHU”) and further directing that the post-graduate seats in these institutions shall be filled up only from those students who have passed MBBS from Institutions, Universities and Colleges in the State of Uttar Pradesh;

(ii) Whether the High Court was justified in issuing a direction that the benefit of service rendered in remot































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top