T. S. THAKUR, A. M. KHANWILKAR, D. Y. CHANDRACHUD
State of U. P. – Appellant
Versus
Dinesh Singh Chauhan – Respondent
JUDGMENT
KHANWILKAR, J.
Leave granted.
2. We have three sets of matters before us. The first is appeals arising from the common judgment of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dated 7th April, 2016 in Writ Petition Nos: 1380, 34118 and 35051 all of 2015. The second is an appeal arising from the decision of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench dated 27th May, 2016 in Writ Petition No: 12004 of 2016. The third is a Writ Petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India praying for a declaration that the third Proviso to Regulation 9(2) of the Post Graduate Medical Education Regulations, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the said Regulation’), is unconstitutional and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution; and for a direction against the Authorities to refrain from disturbing the selection of the said writ petitioners or to interfere with their Post Graduate studies which they are presently pursuing. The latter two proceedings are the fall out of the interim order passed by this Court dated 12th May, 2016.
3. The first set of appeals (arising
Preeti Srivastava (Dr.) V. State of M.P.
State of M.P. v. Gopal D. Tirthani
Dinesh Kumar (Dr.) (II) v. Motilal Nehru Medical College
Snehelata Patnaik (Dr.) v. State of Orissa
Narayan Sharma (Dr.) v. Pankaj Sharma Kr. Lenkar
State of U.P. v. Pradip Tandon
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.