SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(SC) 743

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Jagdish Singh Khehar, CJI., D.Y. Chandrachud, J.
Jaghbir Singh & Ors. – Petitioners
Versus
P.K. Tripathi, Chief Secy., Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors. – Respondents
Conmt. Petition (C)No. 222 of 2012 In Writ Petition(C) No. 4677 of 1985
Decided On : 10-07-2017

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:- Sanchar Anand, Devendra Singh, Advs.
For the Respondents (For RR No.6):- Dhruv Mehta, Sr. Adv., Anupam Varma, Nikhil Sharma, Rahul Kinra, Vineet Kr.Singh, Abhay Kumar, Advocates.
For the RR No.7 :- Arjun Singh Bhati, Ms.Liz Mathew, Chirag M. Shroff, Ms. Neha Sangwan, Ms.Sarika Soam, Praveen Swarup, Ameet Singh, Ms.Sushama Verma, Lokendra Kumar, Advs.

Headnote:Constitution of India – Article 129 r/w Section 12, Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 – Two orders passed by Supreme Court for closure of industrial units in residential areas of Delhi – Contemnor violating the orders – Giving undertaking before Supreme Court – Overlooking the undertaking for ten years – Contemnor held guilty of contempt of the Supreme Court – Punished with sentence of ten days imprisonment coupled with fine at the rate of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) per month for the entire duration of the misuser. (Para 14)

JUDGMENT

Jagdish Singh Khehar, CJI.

The fact of there being large scale unauthorised industrial activities in Delhi, in residential areas, prompted this Court to entertain a number of writ petitions filed in public interest. The first final order, in this behalf, came to be filed in M.C.Mehta v. Union of India and others, (2004) 6 SCC 588. The operative part of the order passed by this Court is extracted hereunder:

"69. In conclusion, having regard to the aforesaid, we issue the following directions:

1. All industrial units that have come up in residential/non-conforming areas in Delhi on or after 1-8-1990 shall close down and stop operating as per the following schedule:

(a) Industrial units pertaining to extensive industries (`F' category) - within a period of four months.

(b) Industrial units pertaining to light and service industries (Categories `B' to `F') - within five months.

(c) Impermissible household industries (Category `A') - within six months.

(d) 6000 industrial units on waiting list for allotment of industrial plots - within 18 months.

2. The Central Government is directed to finalise the list of permissible household industries falling in Category `A' within a period of three months.

3. 6000 industrial units on waiting list shall be allotted industrial plots within one year.

4. The Delhi Government may announce a policy within six weeks giving such incentives as it may deem fit and proper to those industrial units which came to be established after 1-8-1990 and may close down on their own before the expiry of the time fixed in this order. The non-announcement of incentives by the Government shall not, however, delay the closure process.

5. The water and electricity connection of the industrial units found operating after the due date of closure shall be disconnected forthwith and in any case not later than a month of the date fixed for closure in Direction 1 above. If the industrial activity still continues, the premises shall be sealed within a period of not later than another one month. The seal shall be removed and water and electricity connection restored only after filing of an undertaking by the industrial unit not to recommence any sort of industrial activity before an officer nominated for the purpose by the Delhi State.

6. The Central Government is directed to finalise within six months appropriate steps to be taken for making NCR region a success for industrial activity by removing the hurdles pointed out by the industry. The Governments of the adjoining States of U.P., Rajasthan and Haryana are directed to extend full cooperation.

7. The Municipal Corporation of Delhi shall consider within three months the aspect of withdrawal of exemption notification as suggested in the affidavit of its town planner filed on 28-10-2002.

8. We appoint a Monitoring Committee comprising: (i) Chief Secretary of Delhi, (ii) Commissioner of Police, Delhi, (iii) Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Delhi, and (iv) Vice-Chairman of the Delhi Development Authority. This Committee would be responsible for stoppage of illegal industrial activity. It would, however, be open to the aforesaid members of the Monitoring Committee to appoint responsible officers subordinate to them to oversee and ensure compliance with the directions contained in the judgment.

9. The first progress report by the Committee shall be filed by 31-8-2004 and thereafter it shall be filed, at least once in a period of every two months."

M.C.Mehta v. Union of India, (2004) 6 SCC 588 – Relied upon [Para 1]

2. A perusal of the above order reveals, that this Court passed the above closure order, by categorising industries into various groups. The Delhi Government was directed to announce a policy within six weeks for giving incentives, as it may consider appropriate, to those industrial units which were set up after 01-08-1990, and were closed down, on their own, before the expiry of the period depicted in paragraph 69 (extracted above). Such of the industries, as were found



































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top