DIPAK MISRA, AMITAVA ROY, A. M. KHANWILKAR
Indian Centre for Advancement of Research and Education Haldia (ICARE) – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dipak Misra, CJI.
In this Writ Petition preferred under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner No. 1-Indian Centre for Advancement of Research and Education, Haldia (ICARE), a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1961 through its Secretary, and the petitioner No. 2-ICARE Institute of Medical Sciences and Research and Dr. Bidhan Chandra Roy Hospital, Haldia situated in West Bengal through its Principal have prayed for issue of a writ of certiorari for quashment of the order dated 31.05.2017 passed by the competent authority of the Government of India, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare and further to issue writ of mandamus or directing the respondents to grant recognition under Section 11(2) of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 (for brevity, 'the Act') approval to the petitioner No. 2 College and recognition to the MBBS degree to be awarded by the West Bengal University of Health Sciences, Kolkata in respect of the students who have completed their courses at petitioner No. 2 College.
2. The facts which are essential for the purp
IQ City Foundation v. Union of India
Amma Chandravati Educational and Charitable Trust v. Union of India
Royal Medical Trust (Registered) v. Union of India
Manohar Lal Sharma v. Medical Council of India
State of Bihar v. P.P. Sharma, IAS
Medical Council of India v. Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences
Royal Medical Trust v. Union of India
Madha Medical College & Research Institute v. Union of India
Major S.D. Singh Medical College and Hospital v. Union of India
Karpagam Faculty of Medical Sciences & Research v. Union of India
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.