SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(SC) 251

R.K.AGRAWAL, R.BANUMATHI
ANILKUMAR JINABHAI PATEL (D) THR. LRs. – Appellant
Versus
PRAVINCHANDRA JINABHAI PATEL – Respondent


JUDGMENT

R. BANUMATHI, J.

Leave granted.

2. Appellants have filed these appeals challenging the judgment dated 27.03.2012 of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay Bench at Aurangabad in W.P. No. 4669 of 2011 in and by which the High Court held that challenge to the arbitral award dated 07.07.1996 was time barred under the provisions of Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short "the Act").

3. The facts of the case are that the appellant No.1/Anilkumar Patel and respondent No.1/Pravinchandra Patel are real brothers and sons of Jinabhai. They had three other brothers who were already separated. So far as the parties before us, they are related as under:-     

Jinabhai

Pravinchandra Jinabhai Patel (R1) =Savitaben P. Patel/wife (R2)

Anilkumar Jinabhai Patel (A1) =Geetaben A. Patel/wife (A1(a))*

Kalpita Dilipkumar Patel (R3)

Alpita Jayesh Soni (P.4)

Trupti P. Patel (p.5)

Darshan A. Patel (A1(b))*

=Monika Darshan Patel/wife (R10)

Chetan A. Pa

















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top