R.K.AGRAWAL, R.BANUMATHI
ANILKUMAR JINABHAI PATEL (D) THR. LRs. – Appellant
Versus
PRAVINCHANDRA JINABHAI PATEL – Respondent
JUDGMENT
R. BANUMATHI, J.
Leave granted.
2. Appellants have filed these appeals challenging the judgment dated 27.03.2012 of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay Bench at Aurangabad in W.P. No. 4669 of 2011 in and by which the High Court held that challenge to the arbitral award dated 07.07.1996 was time barred under the provisions of Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short "the Act").
3. The facts of the case are that the appellant No.1/Anilkumar Patel and respondent No.1/Pravinchandra Patel are real brothers and sons of Jinabhai. They had three other brothers who were already separated. So far as the parties before us, they are related as under:-
| Jinabhai | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Pravinchandra Jinabhai Patel (R1) =Savitaben P. Patel/wife (R2) | Anilkumar Jinabhai Patel (A1) =Geetaben A. Patel/wife (A1(a))* | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.