SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(SC) 1310

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.K. SIKRI, ASHOK BHUSHAN, JJ.
State of Kerala - Petitioner
Versus
Fr. William Fernandez - Respondent
C.A. Nos.3381 to 3400 of 1998
Decided On : 09-10-2017

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Entry 41 and 83 of List I, Entry 52 of List II - Article 286(1)(b) - Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2(23), 2(25) and 2(26) - Entry Tax - Leviability on imported goods - Charging event for customs duty is distinct from the charging event for entry tax - Import process ends when goods cross the customs barriers and are released for home consumption (Paras 102, 105) - State Legislature is fully competent to levy entry tax on goods entering a local area for consumption, sale, and use regardless of their origin (Paras 63, 83).

(B) Interpretation of Taxing Statutes - Charging section clear and unambiguous - Definition of "entry of goods" covers goods entering from any place outside the state, which logically includes foreign territories; words of limitation cannot be introduced by interpretation (Paras 58, 59, 63).

(C) Original Package Theory - Doctrine evolved by American courts holding that imported goods retain their character as imports until the original package is broken - Not applicable in India; imported goods are not immune from non-discriminatory state taxation after they are cleared for home consumption (Paras 121, 123).

(D) Legislative Competence - Entry 52 of List II is not restricted to taxes levied only by local authorities (octroi) - State governments have the legislative competence to determine the policy for the levy and collection of entry tax (Paras 132, 134). (E) Definition of Machinery and Equipment - A plant imported in knocked-down condition is a collection of machineries and is covered under the expression "machinery and equipment" in the statutory schedule (Para 139).

Facts of the case:
Importers challenged the levy of entry tax on goods imported from foreign countries into various states. The petitioners contended that the entry tax legislations did not contemplate taxing imported goods, that such levies encroached upon the Union's exclusive legislative domain over customs and foreign trade, and that the

Legal Category Hierarchy

Table of Contents

1. Appeals concerning entry tax on goods imported from foreign countries into State local areas – legislative competence challenged. (Para 2 , 3 )

2. Petitioners: Acts not intended to cover imports; encroach on Union powers; import continues till factory. States: charging sections cover all origins; State fully competent. (Para 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 )

3. Entry tax legislations include imported goods; State competent under Entry 52 List II; import ends at customs clearance; original package doctrine inapplicable. (Para 44 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 , 104 , 105 , 106 , 107 , 108 , 109 , 110 , 111 , 112 , 113 , 114 , 115 , 116 , 117 , 118 , 119 , 120 , 121 , 122 , 123 , 124 , 125 , 126 , 127 , 128 , 129 , 130 , 131 , 132 , 133 , 134 , 135 , 136 , 137 , 138 , 139 , 140 , 141 , 142 , 143 , 144 )

4. State legislatures can levy entry tax under Entry 52 List II on imported goods after customs clearance; does not encroach on Union powers. (Para 67 , 83 , 105 , 123 , 144 )

5. Dismissed appeals against Orissa and Patna High Courts; allowed State of Kerala appeals; set aside Jharkhand judgment; liberty to raise Article 304(a) issue. (Para 145 , 146 )

6. Is entry tax on imported goods within the legislative competence of State legislatures?

Yes, under Entry 52 List II, the tax is on entry into local area for consumption, use or sale and does not encroach on Union's customs power. (Para 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 )

7. When does the import of goods end for purposes of state taxation?

Import ends when goods cross the customs barrier and are cleared for home consumption; thereafter they are part of the mass of goods within the country. (Para 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 , 104 , 105 )

8. Does the original package doctrine apply in India to exempt imported goods from state tax?

No, the doctrine has been disapproved by the Federal Court and the Supreme Court; imported goods after customs clearance are not immune from nondiscriminatory state taxes. (Para 106 , 107 , 108 , 109 , 110 , 111 , 112 , 113 , 114 , 115 , 116 , 117 , 118 , 119 , 120 , 121 , 122 , 123 )

9. Does the non-inclusion of 'customs duty' in the definition of purchase value exclude imported goods from entry tax?

No, the definition includes 'all other charges incidental to purchase', which covers customs duty; omission is not indicative of legislative intent to exclude imports. (Para 124 , 125 , 126 , 127 )

10. Is entry tax under Entry 52 List II essentially octroi leviable only by local authorities?

No, the constitutional entry is wide and does not restrict the levy to local authorities; the State may collect and distribute the tax as a matter of legislative policy. (Para 128 , 129 , 130 , 131 , 132 , 133 , 134 , 135 )

JUDGMENT :

1. Leave granted.

2. These appeals relate to entry tax levied on goods imported from different countries and brought into local area of a State. The legislative competence of the State Legislature to impose entry tax on the goods imported from outside the country entering into local area of the State is questioned. The State legislations are also questioned on the ground that the entry tax legislations do not contemplate levy of an entry tax on goods imported from outside the country. In this batch of appeals we are concerned only with entry tax legislations of States, namely, State of Orissa, State of Bihar, State of Kerala and State of Jharkhand, the relevant provisions of which statutes shall be noticed hereinafter.

3. A nine-Judge constitution Bench in Jindal Stainless v. State of Haryana and another, 2016 (11) Scale 1, had answered several questions pertaining to entry tax legislations of different States, which has largely settled various issues relating to entry tax. However, the issue pertaining to levibility of entry tax on the imported/foreign goods was left to be answered by regular Bench. Answering the reference following was stated in answer No.10:

"The questions whether the entire State can be notified as a local area and whether entry tax can be levied on goods entering landmass of India from another country are left to be determined in appropriate proceedings.” (emphasis by us)

4. As noted above this batch of appeals consists of appeals from the judgments of Orissa High Court, Patna High Court, Kerala High Court and Jharkhand High Court. Large number of appeals have been filed questioning the different judgments rendered by different High Courts. For deciding this batch of appeals it is sufficient to notice facts of few of the appeals of each State. The parties shall be referred to as described in the High Courts.

State of Orissa

5. In the appeals arising out of the judgments of the High Court of Orissa, most of the appeals have been filed against judgments dated 18.02.2008 and 09.10.2012. Judgments of different dates were also delivered by the Orissa High Court following its judgments dated 18.02.2008 and 09.10.2012. There are appeals containing different facts and grounds which shall separately be noticed.

6. With regard to judgment dated 18.02.2008 delivered in bunch of writ petitions, we take up Civil Appeal arising out of SLP(C) No.18405 of 2008 – M/s. Steel Authority of India Ltd. v. State of Orissa & Anr. The State of Orissa enacted Orissa Entry Tax Act, 1999 (hereinafter referred to as “1999 Act”) to provide for levy of tax on entry of the scheduled goods into a local area for consumption, use or sale therein and matters incidental thereto and connected therewith.

7. The Steel Authority of India, a public sector undertaking of Government of India filed the writ petition challenging the legality and constitutional validity of Orissa Entry Tax Act, 1999 and Orissa Entry Tax Rules, 2000 in so far as it seeks to levy and collect entry tax on imported goods including scheduled goods when brought into the mines premises of the writ petitioner No.1 Company at Purunapani, Kalta, Barsua in the District of Sundergarh and Bolani in the District Keonjhar. The validity of the Act was challenged on various grounds including the ground that 1999 Act is ultra vires to the Constitution. It was further pleaded that provisions of 1999 Act do not provide for levying of tax on imported raw materials for its plants and machineries which is used/consumed at its factory for the manufacture of its finished products. The grounds were also raised that levy is not compensatory.

8. The writ petition was heard along with the bunch of writ petitions raising some similar and some different grounds. The Division Bench vide its judgment dated 18.02.2008 upheld the vires of 1999 Act.

Civil Appeals arising out of SLP(C) Nos.12424-12425 of 2008 – M/s. Simples Infrastructures Limited v. State of Orissa & Ors. also needs to be noted:

9. The w

































































































































































































































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top