SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(SC) 1368

T. S. THAKUR, A. M. KHANWILKAR
Mithu Pasi – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants :Mr. Syed Ali Ahmad, Mr. Syed Tanweer Ahmad, Mr. S.S. Bandyopadhyay, Mr. Praveen Kumar, and Mr. Mohan Pandey, Advocates.
For the Respondent:Mr. Krishnanand Pandey, Advocate.

ORDER :

We have heard learned counsel for the parties at some length on the question of suspension of remainder of the sentence awarded to the appellants. It is common ground that the appellants were about 20 years of age on the date of the incident which occurred some 19 years ago. Appellant No.2-Bhithan Pasi is alleged to have inflicted a knife injury measuring 1.5” x 3.4” inches on the victim. The appellants have already undergone nearly 6 years of imprisonment without remission out of the 10 years awarded to them by the trial court under Section 326 of the I.P.C. The hearing of the appeal is likely to take some time. In the circumstances we deem it just and proper to direct suspension of the remainder of the sentence awarded to the appellants. We accordingly direct that in case the appellants furnish bail bonds in a sum of Rs.20,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court, they shall be enlarged from custody pending the disposal of this case.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top