SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(SC) 1611

JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR, D. Y. CHANDRACHUD
Ultratech Cement Limited – Appellant
Versus
Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Utpadan Nigam Limited – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Dr. A.M. Singhvi, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Amit Pawan, Ms. Suruchi Kasliwal, Mr. Amit Bhandari, Mr. Akshat Shrivastava and Mr. Gaurav Singh, Advocates, Mr. Gourab Kr. Banerji, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Amit Pawan, Ms. Suruchi Kasliwal, Mr. Sahil Tagotra, Mr. Akshat Shrivastava and Mr. Gaurav Singh, Advocates, Mr. Amit Pawan, Advocate, Mr. U.A. Rana, Mrs. Mrinal Elkar Mazumdar and Mr. Himanshu Mehta, Advocates for M/s Gagrat & Co., Mr. V. Shekhar, Sr. Advocate and Mr. Praveen Kumar, Advocate, Mr. Praveen Kumar, Mr. Shantanu Kumar and Mr. Smarhar Singh, Advocates
For the Respondent:Mr. K.K. Venugopal, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Ajay Choudhary and Mr. Puneet Taneja, Advocates

ORDER :

Civil Appeal @ SLP(C) No. 37709/2013

Leave granted.

2. The appellant – Ultratech Cement Limited, and the respondent - Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Utpadan Nigam Limited, entered into an agreement in 2004. The respondent allowed the appellant to take away fly ash, without any payment, for a period of 5 years. It is not a matter of dispute, that the agreement commenced effectively in the year 2007, and as such, free supply of fly ash would continue up to the year 2012. The agreement, which was for a period of 10 years, allowed the respondent to raise a charge for taking away fly ash, after the initial period of 5 years.

3. In order to determine the commercial value of fly ash, the respondent issued notice, inviting tenders for the sale of fly ash, in the year 2011. Since the dispute between the parties was arbitrable, an application was filed by the appellant, under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act'), with the following prayers:

"Therefore, filing application along with affidavit, it is humbly prayed that allowing the application of the applicant company the respondent may be restrained by way of interim injunction that till ad

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top