A.K.SIKRI, S.ABDUL NAZEER
Mahender Chawla – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
A.K. Sikri, J.
The instant writ petition filed by the petitioners under Article 32 of the Constitution of India raises important issues touching upon the efficacy of the criminal justice system in this country. In an adversarial system, which is prevalent by India, the court is supposed to decide the cases on the basis of evidence produced before it. This evidence can be in the form of documents. It can be oral evidence as well, i.e., the deposition of witnesses. The witnesses, thus, play a vital role in facilitating the court to arrive at correct findings on disputed questions of facts and to find out where the truth lies. They are, therefore, backbone in decision making process. Whenever, in a dispute, the two sides come out with conflicting version, the witnesses become important tool to arrive at right conclusions, thereby advancing justice in a matter. This principle applies with more vigor and strength in criminal cases inasmuch as most of such cases are decided on the basis of testimonies of the witnesses, particularly, eye-witnesses, who may have seen actual oc
Swaran Singh v. State of Punjab
People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) v. Union of India
Zahira Habibulla Sheikh vs. Gujarat
Naresh Shridhar Mirajkar v. State of Maharashtra
Sunil Kumar Pal v. Phota Sheikh
Delhi Domestic Working Women’s Forum v. Union of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.