SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.K. SIKRI, S. ABDUL NAZEER, JJ.
Mahender Chawla & Ors. – Petitioners
Versus
Union of India & Ors. – Respondents
Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 156 of 2016
Decided On : 05-12-2018
2003 (10) SCALE 967; (2004) 5 SCC 518 – Relied upon
(1966) 3 SCR 744; AIR 1984 SC 1591; (1995) 1 SCC 14; (2001) 4 SCC 667; (2002) SLT 587; (2000) 5 SCC 68; (2017) 1 SCC 529; 2003 (9) SCALE 329; (2004) 4 SCC 158; 2006 (3) SCALE 967; (1966) 3 SCR 744 – Referred
(b) Constitution of India – Article – Threats and other pressures for not testifying in courts – Violation of Article 21 – Right to life also includes a society free from crime and fear. (Para 16)
(c) Witness Protection Scheme, 2018 – To ensure that the investigation, prosecution and trial of criminal offences is not prejudiced because witnesses are intimidated or frightened to give evidence without protection from violent or other criminal recrimination. (Para 23, 24)
(d) Witness Protection Scheme, 2018 – Essential features – Identifying categories of threat perceptions, preparation of a “Threat Analysis Report”, types of protection measures, protection of identity, change of identity, relocation of witness, witnesses to be apprised of the scheme, confidentiality and preservation of records, recovery of expenses etc. (Para 26)
(2004) 5 SCC 518 – Relied upon
(e) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – Section 273 – Requirement of recording evidence of witnesses in presence of accused – Law Commission’s view that victim and vulnerable witnesses in rape cases in absence of accused – Refused – Video conferencing may, however, be the solution – Vulnerable Witness Deposition Complexes – Paramount need to have witness protection regime, in a statutory form – Directions given – To be treated as law under Article 141, Constitution of India till such time a legislation is enacted. (Para 29, 31, 34, 35)
Crl. Appeal No. 1820/2017 – Relied upon
Facts of the case:
This writ petition raises the issue of conditions of witnesses and witness protection.
In the instant case itself the petitioners have approached this Court with the allegations that in the trials that are going on against Asaram, who is charged with the offence of committing rapes in numerous cases, the witnesses have been frightened with serious consequences in case they depose against Asaram. It is alleged that as many as 10 witnesses have already been attacked and three witnesses have been killed.
Finding of the Court:
Witness Protection Scheme, 2018 accepted. Directions given.
Result: Petition disposed of.
JUDGMENT :
A.K. Sikri, J.
The instant writ petition filed by the petitioners under Article 32 of the Constitution of India raises important issues touching upon the efficacy of the criminal justice system in this country. In an adversarial system, which is prevalent by India, the court is supposed to decide the cases on the basis of evidence produced before it. This evidence can be in the form of documents. It can be oral evidence as well, i.e., the deposition of witnesses. The witnesses, thus, play a vital role in facilitating the court to arrive at correct findings on disputed questions of facts and to find out where the truth lies. They are, therefore, backbone in decision making process. Whenever, in a dispute, the two sides come out with conflicting version, the witnesses become important tool to arrive at right conclusions, thereby advancing justice in a matter. This principle applies with more vigor and strength in criminal cases inasmuch as most of such cases are decided on the basis of testimonies of the witnesses, particularly, eye-witnesses, who may have seen actual occurrence/crime. It is for this reason that Bentham stated more than 150 years ago that “witnesses are eyes and ears of justice”.
2. Thus, witnesses are important players in the judicial system, who help the judges in arriving at correct factual findings. The instrument of evidence is the medium through which facts, either disputed or required to be proved, are effectively conveyed to the courts. This evidence in the form of documentary and oral is given by the witnesses. A witness may be a partisan or interested witness, i.e., a witness who is in a near relation with the victim of crime or is concerned with conviction of the accused person. Even his testimony is relevant, though, stricter scrutiny is required while adjudging the credence of such a victim. However, apart from these witnesses or the witnesses who may themselves be the victims, other witnesses may not have any personal interest in the outcome of a case. They still help the judicial system. In the words of Whittaker Chambers, a witness is “a man whose life and faith are so completely one that when the challenge comes to step out and testify for his faith, he does so, disregarding all risks, accepting all consequences [Whittaker Chambers, WITNESS QUOTES (January 7, 2014, 10.30 am), http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/keywords/witness.].”
3. The importance of the witness, particularly in a criminal trial is highlighted in a book in the following manner:-
"In search of truth, he plays that sacred role of the sun, which eliminates the darkness of ignorance and illuminates the face of justice, encircled by devils of humanity and compassion.
xxx xxx xxx
The value of witnesses can’t be denied, keeping in view the dependency of the criminal proceedings on the testimonies and cooperation of witnesses in all the stages of the proceedings, especially in those cases where the prosecution has to establish the guilt with absolute certainty via oral cross-examination of witnesses in hearings open to the world at large. In such cases, the testimony of a witness, even if not as an eye witness, may prove to be crucial in determining the circumstances in which the crime might have been committed...” [Witness Protection in Criminal Trial in India by Girish Abhyankar & Asawari Abhyankar]
Notwithstanding the same, the conditions of witnesses in Indian Legal System can be termed as ‘pathetic’. There are many threats faced by the witnesses at various stages of an investigation and then during the trial of a case. Apart from facing life threatening intimidation to himself and to his relatives, he may have to face the trauma of attending the court regularly. Because of the lack of Witness Protection Programme in India and the treatment that is meted out to them, there is a tendency of reluctance in coming forward and mak
Swaran Singh v. State of Punjab
People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) v. Union of India
Zahira Habibulla Sheikh vs. Gujarat
Naresh Shridhar Mirajkar v. State of Maharashtra
Sunil Kumar Pal v. Phota Sheikh
Delhi Domestic Working Women’s Forum v. Union of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.