A.K.SIKRI, ASHOK BHUSHAN, S.ABDUL NAZEER
K. LAKSHMINARAYANAN – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Ashok Bhushan, J.
Leave granted.
1. These two appeals have been filed against the common judgment of Madras High Court dated 22.03.2018 by which the writ petitions filed by the appellants questioning the nominations made by the Central Government in exercise of power under Section 3(3) of the Government of Union Territories Act, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as "Act, 1963"), to the Legislative Assembly of Union Territory of Puducherry has been dismissed.
2. The background facts leading to filing of the writ petitions giving rise to these appeals are as follows:-
2.1 Part VIII of the Constitution of India dealing with the Union Territories was amended by Constitution (Fourteenth Amendment) Act, 1962 by inserting Article 239A, which provides for "creation of local Legislatures or Council of Ministers or both for certain Union Territories." Article 239A provided that Parliament, may by law, create for the Union Territory of Pondicherry, a body, whether elected or partly nominated and partly elected, to function as a Legislature for the Union Territory, or a Council of Minister
Black Diamond Beverages v. Commercial Tax Officer, Central Section, Assessment Wing, Calcutta
Special Reference No.1 of 1964
Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala
State of Rajasthan v. Union of India
Kuldip Nayar v. Union of India
Jindal Stainless Limited v. State of Haryana
State (NCT of Delhi) v. Union of India
State of Rajasthan v. Union of India
Supreme Court Advocates-On-Record Association v. Union of India
U.N.R. Rao v. Smt. Indira Gandhi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.