SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
DIPAK MISRA, CJI., A.K. SIKRI, A.M. KHANWILKAR, Dr D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, ASHOK BHUSHAN, JJ.
Government of NCT of Delhi – Appellant
Versus
Union of India & Another – Respondents
CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 175 OF 2016, WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. 539 OF 1986, CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2357, 2358, 2359, 2360, 2361, 2362, 2363 & 2364 OF 2017, CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 277 OF 2017
Decided on : 04-07-2018
(a) Interpretation of Constitution – Considerations – Constitutional pragmatism, sanctity of objectivity, realization of the purpose, sacrosanctity of democratic structure, constitutional trust and morality, and decentralization of power – “Confluence of the idea and spirit of the Constitution” – Democratic nature of the Constitution and paradigm of representative participation comprised in “spirit of the Constitution”. (Para 4, 5, 11)
1951 SCR 228; (1971) 1 SCC 85; (1976) 2 SCC 310; (1993) 4 SCC 441 – Relied upon
(b) Constitution of India – Article 239AA and 239AB r/w 1991 Act– a
Constitutional law – Representative form of governance – Public accountability – Accessibility and approachability – Constitutional morality – Theory of "checks and balances" – "Constitutional objectivity" – To be equally followed by Executive and Legislature. (Para 54, 55, 59, 61, 62, 64)
(2000) 4 SCC 640; (2014) 9 SCC 1; (2015) 3 SCC 467; AIR 1993 SC 477 – Referred
(c) Constitutional law – Supremacy of Constitution, the suprema lex – “Checks and balances" and "separation of powers" – Collective responsibility – Of immense significance in the context of ‘aid and advice’ of the Council of Ministers, (Para 67, 68, 78, 83)
(2018) 7 SCALE 106; (2001) 7 SCC 231; (2014) 9 SCC 1; (2000) 4 SCC 309; 1990 (2) SCALE 836; (1978) 2 SCR 1; (1999) 6 SCC 667 – Referred
(d) Constitutional law – Democracy – Faith of people in democratic process – Right to vote – Trust reposed in and responsibility of elected representatives – Democracy needs to be protected, preserved and sustained – Good governance sine qua non for a healthy democracy. (Para 88, 89, 91)
AIR 1978 SC 851; AIR 1980 SC 1362; AIR (1973) SC 1461; AIR 1975 SC 2299; (1995) 4 SCC 611; AIR 2006 SC 3127; (2014) 9 SCC 1 – Relied upon
(e) Constitutional law – Federalism – India having a democracy which is quasifederal in nature – Interpretation of constitution should not whittle down the powers of the State Legislature and preserve federalism while also upholding the central supremacy – Unity and the territorial integrity of India – Special feature of our constitutional federalism – Collaborative federalism – Calls for coordination amongst the Union and State Governments – Negotiation and coordination to iron out differences. (Para 98, 104, 106, 107, 109, 117)
AIR 1965 SC 745; (1978) 2 SCR 1; AIR 1974 SC 2192; (1994) 3 SCC 1; (2002) 9 SCC 23; AIR 2006 SC 3127 – Relied upon
301 U.S. 495, 525 – 26 (1937) – Referred
(f) Constitutional law – Pragmatic federalism – Constitution broadly having a federal character, and also having unitary features – Power of Parliament to alter or change the areas, boundaries or names of the States; in emergency, to make laws in relation to matters under the State List, give directions to the States and empower Union officers to execute matters in the State List; prevalence of Union Law in case of inconsistency between the Union and the State laws; Power of a Governor to reserve the bill passed by the State Legislature for consideration of the President, the President not being bound to give his assent to such a bill; dissolution of a State Legislature and imposition of President’s rule either on report of Governor or otherwise upon failure of constitutional machinery in the State – Pragmatic federalism incorporates traits and attributes of sensibility and realism – It leans on the principle of permissible practicability – It has inbuilt ability to constantly evolve with the changing needs and situations. (Para 121, 125, 126)
(1994) 3 SCC 1– Relied upon
(g) Constitutional law – “Federal balance” – Between federalism and centralism – Role of the Court in ensuring the federal balance assumes great importance. (Para 127, 131)
Special Reference No. 1 of 1964; (2017) 2 SCC 585 – Relied upon
(h) Interpretation of Constitution, an organic and living document – Acknowledged as sui generis in nature – Words in the constitution having many a concept – Should interpretation of constitution be historical interpretation or contemporaneous interpretation – Discretion of Judges – Rules of statutory interpretation can serve as a guide – Constitutional courts, while interpreting constitution, not required to strictly comply with these rules – In a controversy arising out of a constitutional provision, Courts primary responsibility is to work out a solution. (Para 134, 135, 139, 140, 141)
AIR 1993 SC 1804; (1993) 4 SCC 441 – Relied upon
60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857); 290 U.S. 398 (1934); 300 US 379 (1937); 17 US (4Wheat) 316 (1819); 285 US (1932); 339 US (1950); 345 US(1953); 69 F. 2d 809, 810-II (1934); [1984] 2 SCR 145; [1930] AC 124 – Referred
(i) Interpretation of constitution – Should not be confined to literal rule, especially if it would not serve fructification of rights and values expressed in the Constitution – In such case Courts should resort to purposive interpretation – Purposes may be subjective as well as objective. (Para 146, 156)
(2001) 7 SCC 126; (1997) 5 SCC 201; (2011) 7 SCC 179; (2006) 8 SCC 202 – Relied upon
[1991] 2 AC 240; (2003) UKHL 13 : (2003) 2 AC 687 : (2003) 2 WLR 692 (HL); 148 F 2d 737 (2d Cir 1945) – Referred
(j) Constitutional law – Constitutional culture – Set of norms and practices giving life to text of the Constitution – The conceptual normative spirit transforming the Constitution into a dynamic document – Constantly enabling the words in the Constitution to keep in stride with the rapid and swift changes occurring in the society – State and the people both responsible for fostering this culture – For this a pragmatic approach of interpretation has to be adopted by Courts – Creativity, practical applicability and perception of reality from the societal perspective must be considered while interpreting constitution. (Para 158, 159, 161, 170)
(2016) 5 SCC 1; AIR 1978 SC 215; AIR 1993 SC 477; (1978) 1 SCR 423 – Relied upon
(k) Constitution of India – Article 239 – Union Territories to be administered by the President through an Administrator appointed by him, independently and autonomously. (Para 173, 174)
AIR 1974 SC 2192; (2013) 1 SCC 403 – Relied upon
(l) Constitution of India – Article 239AA and Article 246 – All Union Territories not on same pedestal – NCT of Delhi not a State within the meaning of Article 246 or Part-VI – It remains a UT even after special status conferred by SixtyNinth Amendment governed by Article 246(4) – a (Para 191,
(1982) 2 SCC 222; AIR 1963 SC 1760 : (1964) 3 SCR 787; (1997) 7 SCC 339 – Relied upon
AIR 1974 SC 2192 – Referred
(m) Constitution of India – Article 239AA r/w Article 74 and 163 – President almost always bound by aid and advice of the Union Council of Ministers – Governor, however, may act in his discretion only where so permitted by an express provision of the Constitution – Lieutenant Governor of Delhi, even in matters within legislative powers of Delhi Legislative Assembly not bound by aid and advice of council of Ministers – In case of dispute, matter to be referred to the President for a binding decision – NCT of Delhi cannot be accorded status of a State – Lieutenant Governor of Delhi remains an Administrator working with the designation of Lieutenant Governor. (Para 194, 195, 196)
(n) Constitution of India – Article 239AA(3)(a) and (4) – Executive power of the Government of NCT of Delhi is conterminous with the legislative power of the Delhi Legislative Assembly. (Para 199)
(o) Constitution of India – Article 73, Proviso – “State” in the Proviso – Cannot be read to mean Union Territory. (Para 200)
(p) Constitution of India – Articles 239AA and 239AB – With Legislative Assembly, Council of Ministers and the Westminster style cabinet system of government, NCT of Delhi is a class by itself – Executive power of Government of NCT of Delhi coextensive with the legislative power of the Delhi Legislative Assembly – Union having limited executive power in respect of NCT of Delhi – Restricted to those matters for which legislative power of Delhi Legislative Assembly has been excluded under Article 239 AA (3) (a). (Para 219)
AIR 1955 SC 549 – Relied upon
AIR 1974 SC 2192; (1982) 2 SCC 222 – Referred
(q) Constitution of India – Articles 239AA – “On any matter” – “Any” – Can have different meanings depending on the context – It must not be mechanically interpreted to mean 'every' – Lieutenant Governor therefore cannot every decision of the Government to the President – There has to be some valid grounds therefor – Proviso to Article 239AA(4) cannot be interpreted in a strict sense of the mere words employed – Article 239AA does not perceive a situation of constant friction and difference. (Para 227, 232, 233, 234, 236)
(1987) 2 SCC 707; AIR 1993 SC 412; (1969) 1 SCC 839; AIR 1958 SC 353 – Relied upon
(1970) 2 SCC 272; 544 U.S. 385 (2005); 16 U.S. 3 Wheat .610610(1818); [1892] 1 QB 817 – Referred
(r) Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi Act, 1991 – Section 41 r/w Article 239AA(4) and its Proviso, Constitution of India – Aid and advice of council of Ministers – Binding on Lieutenant Governor so long the powers under the Proviso is not exercised. (Para 242)
(s) Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi Act, 1991 – Section 45 – Chief Minister to communicate to the Lieutenant Governor all decisions of the Council of Ministers and proposals for legislation – Not for obtaining concurrence of the Lieutenant Governor – Object is to enable the Lieutenant Governor to exercise the power conferred upon him by the proviso to clause (4) of Article 239AA, constitution of India. (Para 247)
Transaction of Business of the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi Rules, 1993 – Rule 49 and 50 – The approach of dialogue, settlement by discussion and suppressing conflicts by harmonious coexistence should also be adopted in case of difference of opinion between the Lieutenant Governor and the Council – Communication to Lieutenant Governor not to obtain his concurrence or permission – But to enable him to scrutinize the said proposals, agendas and decisions in order to exercise his powers under clause (4) of Article 239AA – Lieutenant Governor and Council of Ministers should work in harmony. (Para 262, 263, 265, 268)
(t) Interpretation of statutes – External aid – Reports of the committee preceding enactment of a legislation – Can be taken help for – However, instantly, when the Court analyzes every aspect in detail there will be no need to take help of such report. (Para 270)
[1975] AC 373; (1989) AC 571; (1969) 2 AC 313; (1975) AC 591; (1984) 2 SCC 183; (2002) 3 SCC 676; (2002) 8 SCC 481 – Referred
(u) Constitutional law – Constitutional renaissance – 1991 Act and the TBR, 1993 conceive of discussion, deliberation and dialogue – Exercise of entitlement to differ has to be based on principle and supported by cogent reasons – The LG and the Council of Ministers should primarily strive for a solution. (Para 276)
Per Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, J. (Coalescing)
(v) Constitutional law – Rule of law – How citizens respond to their statesmen has a powerful role in giving meaning to the fine print of law. (Para 3)
(w) Constitutional law – Constitutional morality – Should guide core values of Indian democracy, to be protected and sustained – It has to be cultivated and learned. (Para 6, 7)
(x) Constitutional law – Constitutional morality – Not only allegiance to substantive provisions and principles of the Constitution – Signifies a constitutional culture which each individual in a democracy must imbibe – Consensual decision making – Balances popular morality – It requires existence of sentiments and dedication for realizing the cherished social transformation – Provides enabling framework that allows a society the possibilities of self-renewal. (Para 9, 11, 12, 13)
(y) Interpretation of Constitution – Aspects to be kept in mind – The Constitution is an expression of the sovereignty of the people – It seeks to achieve its vision of a political and social ordering on the basis of democracy – It recognises the aspirations of popular sovereignty – It adopts a republican form of government vesting the powers of sovereignty in the people which are exercised directly or through their elected representatives – It has a secular ideology. (Para 19, 113)
AIR 1973 SC 1461; (1951) 2 SCR 228; (1970) 2 SCC 272; (1972) 3 SCC 717; (2006) 7 SCC 1; (2014) 9 SCC 1 – Relied upon
(z) Constitutional law – Constitutional amendment – Does not reflect deficiency of its original text – Basic structure like republican form of democratic government and preservation of basic human freedoms beyond amending power – Basic structure doctrine and power of judicial review. (Para 21, 22, 23)
(2017) 10 SCC 1; (1973) 4 SCC 225; (1994) 3 SCC 1; 1992 SCC Supl. (2) 651; (2007) 2 SCC 1 – Relied upon
(aa) Constitution of India – Article 239AA – Creating NCT of Delhi and its Legislative Assembly – Assembly having powers to legislate in regard to the entries in the State and Concurrent lists to the extent to which they apply to a Union territory – In addition it is debarred from legislating on subjects under Entries 1, 2 and 18 under the State List; and Entries 64, 65 and 66 in so far they relate to Entries 1, 2 and 18 – That apart, Parliament has legislative power over State as well as Concurrent List subjects – Thus legislative powers are circumscribed firstly, by carving out certain subjects from its competence (vesting them in Parliament) and secondly, by enabling Parliament to enact law on matters falling both in the State and Concurrent lists – Moreover, even in the subjects assigned to it, the legislative authority of the Assembly is not exclusive and is subject to laws which are enacted by Parliament. (Para 29)
(ab) Constitutional law – Cabinet form of Government – Collective responsibility – A political responsibility– All the Ministers are treated as one entity – Ministers must accept responsibility for every executive act – Government politically responsible for decisions and policies of each of the Ministers and of his department – However, individual ministerial decisions do not always generate collective legal responsibilities – Collective responsibility of Council of Ministers ensures accountability to the legislature and to the electorate. (Para 36, 37)
(1955) 2 SCR 225; (1970) 1 SCC 443; (1974) 2 SCC 831; (1977) 4 SCC 608; (1999) 6 SCC 667; (2012) 3 SCC 64; (2010) 6 SCC 113; (2017) 3 SCC 1; 2017(2) SCALE 292 – Relied upon
(ac) Constitution of India – Article 74 – Aid and advice – President is bound by the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers – Collective responsibility and aid and advice are mutually reinforcing principles – Doctrine of aid and advice enhances accountability and responsive government. (Para 40, 41, 43)
(1971) 2 SCC 63; (1974) 2 SCC 831; (2005) 2 SCC 92; (2016) 8 SCC 1; 1992 SCC Supp. (2) 651 – Relied upon
(ad) Constitutional law – Executive power vested in Council of Ministers of NCT of Delhi – Co-extensive with the legislative power of the legislative assembly – Council of Ministers aids and advises the Lieutenant Governor – Thus Lieutenant Governor acts on basis of such aid and advice – Save and except in regard to areas reserved for exercise of his discretion, the Lieutenant Governor must act on the aid and advice tendered by Council of Ministers. (Para 44)
(ae) Constitution of India – Article 239AA(4) Proviso – “Difference of opinion” and “on any matter” – Lieutenant Governor must either abide by the aid and advice tendered by the Council of Ministers or, in the event of a difference of opinion, reserve it for a decision by the President and thereupon be bound to act in accordance with it. (Para 45)
(af) Constitution of India – Article 239AA(7) – Parliament empowered to implement and to supplement other provisions of Article 239AA – Any law thus made would not amount to constitutional amendment even if it amends or has the effect of amending any provision of the Constitution – Article 362. (Para 47)
(ag) Constitution of India – Article 239AA – NCT Delhi is and continues to be a Union territory – Application of Article 239 not excluded – Article 239AA to be read in conjunction with Article 239 – President empowered by Article 239AB to suspend operation of Article 239AA or of any provision of law made under it and thereupon to make consequential provisions for the administration of the NCT in accordance with Articles 239 and 239AA. (Para 54)
(ah) Constitution of India – Article 239AA(4) Proviso – Difference of opinion – Areas of reference – Subjects excluded from legislative power of the Legislative Assembly. (Para 55)
(ai) Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi Act 1991 – Sections 3, 5, 22, 24, 27, 29, 30, 41, 45 and 52 – Direct election to Legislative Assembly having tenure of five years – Lieutenant Governor can assent to a Bill, withhold assent or reserve the Bill for consideration of the President – Lieutenant Governor having wider powers than a Governor – Act providing for significant interface between the President and the Lieutenant Governor. (Para 77, 78, 80, 87)
(aj) Transaction of Business of the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi Rules, 1993 – Rules 4, 7, 8, 9, 25, 45, 46, 49, 50, 51, 55 – Embodying the principle of collective responsibility – Lieutenant Governor to be kept informed – An obligation and duty has been cast upon the elected government to duly keep the Lieutenant Governor informed of proposals relating to governmental business – To enable the Lieutenant Governor to take a decision for referring a matter to the President – An overriding power of control is conferred upon the President. (Para 88, 89, 90, 93, 103, 105)
(ak) Constitution of India – Article 239AA and section 44(1), Government of Union Territories Act, 1963 – Interpretation of Constitution and interpretation of statute – Constitution being an organic document which defines the basic compact for society, cannot be interpreted in the way in which statutes are interpreted – Distinction between ordinary legislation and Constitutional amendment – Article 239AA cannot be interpreted in a way similar to interpretation of section 44(1) – Similarity of the two may only be one aspect for interpretation of Article 239AA – All Union Territories are not alike and Delhi has special features – It is neither a State nor Union Territory like any other. (Para 116, 121)
(1997) 7 SCC 339 – Relied upon
(1955) 1 SCR 549; (1985) 1 SCC 206; (1962) 2 SCR 794; (2005) 11 SCC 600 – Referred
(1982) 2 SCC 222 – Distinguished
(al) General Clauses Act, 1897 – Section 3(58) – Definition of State – Including a Union Territory – Repugnant to Article 246(4) – Held inapplicable to Article 246(4) – Definitions under Act 1897 apply to constitutional provisions unless repugnant in the subject or context. (Para 123, 124, 126)
(1968) 2 SCR 103; (1997) 7 SCC 339; (1970) 1 SCC 633; (1976) 3 SCC 743 – Relied upon
(am) Constitution of India – Article 239AA – Expression “insofar as any such matter is applicable to Union territories” – Seventh Schedule List III – The Rulings that State does not include Union Territories does not mean that legislative assembly of NCT would have no power to legislate on any subject in the State or Concurrent lists – a (Para 128, 129, 130)
(1968) 2 SCR 103; (1997) 7 SCC 339 – Referred
(an) Constitution of India – Article 239A(4), Proviso – Expression “difference of opinion between the Lieutenant Governor and his Council of Ministers on any of the matter” – Cooperative governance – Articles 256, 257, 258 and 261 – Interpretation of Article 239AA must facilitate mutual cooperation – Constitutional morality must be taken into consideration – ‘Any’ will not mean ‘every’ – Prior concurrence of Lieutenant Governor not contemplated – Proviso should be so interpreted that its operation should preserve the national concerns – Recourse to the Proviso should be taken only when efforts for resolving differences by mutual discussion fail. (Para 135, 136, 137, 142)
Per Ashok Bhushan, J,
(ao) Interpretation of Constitution – General rules are the same as those for interpretation of statutes – Doctrine of literal interpretation and doctrine of purposive interpretation – Constitution should be construed with less rigidity and more generosity – It is a living framework for the Government of the people – Its successful working depends upon the democratic spirit underlying it being respected in letter and in spirit – Constitutional silence and Constitutional implications – However, express Constitutional provisions cannot be ignored while considering such doctrine and principles – Constitutional interpretation has to be purposive taking into consideration the need of time and Constitutional principles (Para 41, 42, 54, 56, 57)
AIR 1951 SC 128 : (1951) SCR 228; (2001) 7 SCC 126; (1972) 3 SCC 717; (2001) 7 SCC 231; (2006) 7 SCC 1; (2007) 2 SCC 1; (1970)1 SCC 248: AIR 1970 SC 564; (1978)1 SCC 248: AIR 1978 SC 597; 1985 Supp. SCC 714; (2014) 9 SCC 1 – Relied upon
(ap) Interpretation of Constitution – External aid – Parliamentary committee report – can be looked into to find out the intent and purpose of legislation – Instantly, Sixty Ninth Constitutional Amendment. (Para 65)
Writ Petition (C) No. 558 of 2012 – Relied upon
(aq) Constitution of India – Article 239AA(3) – Legislative Assembly empowered to make laws in respect of any subject in State List (except Entries 1, 2 and18) and Concurrent Kist (except Entries 64, 65 and 66) – Phrase “in so far as any such matter is applicable to Union territories” held inconsequential. (Para 70, 72)
(ar) Constitution if India – Article 239AA r/w article 246(4) – Union territories are governed by Article 246(4) – Delhi is yet a Union Territory though in a class by itself, certainly not a State – Legislative power of Parliament covers Union Territories including Delhi – Parliament has overriding power to make laws on any subject in respect of NCT of Delhi – Legislative Assembly of NCT has legislative power with respect to the matters enumerated in the State List or Concurrent List excluding the excepted entries of State List. (Para 76, 79, 80)
(1997) 7 SCC 339 – Relied upon
(as) Constitution of India – Article 239AA(4), Proviso r/w section 49, 44, Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi Act, 1991 – Executive power of NCT – Coextensive with Legislative power – General control of the President – President, with regard to a particular executive action referred to him, has exclusive jurisdiction to take a decision – Such decision is binding on both Council of Ministers as well as Lieutenant Governor – President is empowered to make rules for allocation of business to the Ministers – Overriding legislative power of Parliament – Submission that executive power can be exercised by the Union through President only when power under Article 239AB is exercised, rejected. (Para 81, 85, 87, 89)
AIR 1955 SC 549 – Relied upon
(at) Constitution of India – Article 239AA(4), Proviso – “Aid and advice” as given by Council of Ministers – Has to be followed by the Lieutenant Governor unless he decides to exercise his power under the Proviso – Section 44 of the Government of Union Territories Act, 1963. (Para 92)
(1974) 2 SCC 831 – Referred
(au) Constitution of India – Article 239AA(4), Proviso – “Any matter” – exercise of power under Proviso cannot be a routine affair. (Para 98,
(1970) 2 SCC 272 – Referred
(av) Constitution of India – Article 239AA(4) r/w 1991 Act and 1993 Rules – LG has to be kept informed of all proposals, agendas of meeting and decisions taken – To keep him posted with the administration of Delhi – To enable him to exercise powers under 1991 Act and Rules 1993 – To enable him to exercise power under proviso to 239AA(4) – Not to obtain his concurrence of the decision – Council of Ministers, Chief Minister and LG are duty bound to observe 1993 Rules. (Para 113, 116)
Facts of the case:
This case calls for interpretation of Article 239AA of the Constitution.
Findings of the Court:
NCT of Delhi cannot be accorded the status of a State. The status of the Lieutenant Governor of Delhi is not that of a Governor of a State, rather he remains an Administrator, in a limited sense, working with the designation of Lieutenant Governor.
The directly elected Legislative Assembly of NCT shall have legislative powers over matters falling within the State List and the Concurrent List, barring those excepted, and a mandate upon the Lieutenant Governor to act on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers except when he decides to refer the matter to the President for final decision.
The Parliament has the power to make laws for the National Capital Territory of Delhi with respect to any matters enumerated in the State List and the Concurrent List. At the same time, the Legislative Assembly of Delhi also has the power to make laws over all those subjects which figure in the Concurrent List and all, but three excluded subjects, in the State List.
The Lieutenant Governor of NCT of Delhi is bound by the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers so long as he does not exercise his power under the proviso to clause (4) of Article 239AA. The Lieutenant Governor has to either act on the 'aid and advice’ of Council of Ministers or to implement the decision taken by the President on a reference being made by him.
The words “any matter” employed in the proviso to clause (4) of Article 239AA cannot be inferred to mean “every matter”. The Lieutenant Governor should not act in a mechanical manner without due application of mind so as to refer every decision of the Council of Ministers to the President. The difference of opinion between the Lieutenant Governor and the Council of Ministers should have a sound rationale.
The expression ‘state’ in Article 246(4) will not include a Union territory and the definition contained in the General Clauses Act will not apply to Article 246(4).
Key Points: - The National Capital Territory of Delhi is not a State within the meaning of Article 246 or Part VI of the Constitution, but remains a Union Territory (!) (!) (!) . - The Lieutenant Governor of Delhi is an Administrator in a limited sense and is not equivalent to the Governor of a State (!) (!) . - The executive power of the Government of the National Capital Territory of Delhi is coextensive with the legislative power of its Legislative Assembly (!) (!) . - The Lieutenant Governor is bound by the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers, except when exercising powers under the proviso to Article 239AA(4) (!) (!) . - The words "any matter" in the proviso to Article 239AA(4) do not mean "every matter," and the Lieutenant Governor should not act in a mechanical or routine manner to refer decisions to the President (!) (!) . - The Lieutenant Governor must attempt to resolve differences of opinion with the Council of Ministers through discussion and dialogue before referring a matter to the President (!) (!) . - The Council of Ministers is required to communicate decisions to the Lieutenant Governor to keep him apprised, but this does not require his prior concurrence for the implementation of those decisions (!) (!) (!) . - The Parliament has the power to make laws for the National Capital Territory of Delhi with respect to any matters enumerated in the State List and the Concurrent List (!) (!) . - The executive power of the Union is coextensive on all subjects referable to the State and Concurrent Lists on which the Legislative Assembly of the National Capital Territory of Delhi has legislative powers (!) (!) . - The Lieutenant Governor and the Council of Ministers must work in harmony, as the constitutional scheme does not perceive a situation of constant friction (!) (!) .
JUDGMENT :
Dipak Misra, CJI (for himself, A.K. Sikri and A.M. Khanwilkar, JJ.)
CONTENTS
3-22
22-23
23-34
34-45
45-50
50-54
54-57
F. Constitutional governance and the conception of legitimate constitutional trust
5768
68-73
74-93
93-100
101-104
104-108
108-120
120-127
127-135
135-140
140-145
146-160
160-164
188-213
213-217
217-231
The present reference to the Constitution Bench has its own complexity as the centripodal issue in its invitation of the interpretation of Article 239AA of the Constitution invokes a host of concepts, namely, constitutional objectivity navigating through the core structure with the sense and sensibility of having a real test of constitutional structure; the culture of purposive interpretation because the Court is concerned with the sustenance of glory of constitutional democracy in a Democratic Republic as envisioned in the Constitution; and understanding the idea of citizenry participation viewed with the lens of progressive perception inherent in the words of a great living document emphasizing on the democratic theme to achieve the requisite practical goal in the world of reality. We may call it as pragmatic interpretation of a constitutional provision, especially the one that has the effect potentiality to metamorphose a workable provision into an unnecessary and unwarranted piece of ambiguity. In such a situation, the necessity is to scan the anatomy of the provision and lift it to the pedestal of constitutional ethos with the aid of judicial creativity that breathes essentiality of life into the same. It is the hermeneutics of law that works. It is the requisite constitutional stimulus to sustain the fundamental conception of participative democracy so that the real pulse is felt and further the constitutional promise to the citizens is fulfilled. It gets rid of the unpleasant twitches and convulsions. To put it differently, the assurance by the insertion of Article 239AA by the Constitution (Sixtyninth Amendment) Act, 1991 by exercise of the constituent power is not to be renounced with any kind of rigid understanding of the provision. It is because the exercise of constituent power is meant to confer democratic, societal and political powers on the citizens who reside within the National Capital Territory of Delhi that has been granted a special status.
2. The principal question is whether the inhabitants or voters of NCT of Delhi remain where they were prior to the special status conferred on the Union Territory or the amended constitutional provision that has transformed Delhi instills “Prana” into the cells. Let it be made clear that any ingenious effort to scuttle the hope and aspiration that has ignited the idea of
State of Bihar v. Bal Mukund Sah
Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record-Association v. Union of India
The State of Karnataka v. Shri Ranganatha Reddy
Union of India v. Sankalchand Himatlal Sheth
Devji Vallabhbhai Tandel v. Administrator of Goa, Daman and Diu
Shri Balaganesan Metals v. M.N. Shanmugham Chetty
A.V.S. Narasimha Rao v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
Workmen of Dimakuchi Tea Estate v. The Management of Dimakuchi Tea Estate
Black Clawson International Ltd. v. Papierwerke WaldhofAschaffenburg
Shrimant Shamrao Suryavanshi v. Pralhad Bhairoba Suryavanshi
TMA Pai Foundation v. State of Karnataka
Kesavananda Bharati v State of Kerala
Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. U.O.I.
I.R. Coelho v State of Tamil Nadu
Rai Sahib Ram Jawaya Kapur v The State of Punjab
A Sanjeevi Naidu v State of Madras
Samsher Singh v State of Punjab
State of Karnataka v Union of India
Common Cause, A Registered Society v Union of India
Subramanian Swamy v Manmohan Singh
Amarinder Singh v Special Committee, Punjab Vidhan Sabha
Krishna Kumar Singh v State of Bihar
State of Himachal Pradesh v. Satpal Saini
U.N.R. Rao v. Smt. Indira Gandhi
PU Myllai Hlychho v. State of Mizoram
Nabam Rebia and Bamang Felix v Deputy Speaker, Arunachal Pradesh Legislative Assembly
Keshavan Madhava Menon v State of Bombay
Satya Dev Bushahri v. Padam Dev
Goa Sampling Employees’ Association v General Superintendence Co. of India Pvt. Ltd.
The State of Madhya Pradesh v. Shri Moula Bux
State (NCT of Delhi) v Navjot Sandhu
New Delhi Municipal Council v State of Punjab
TM Kanniyan v Income Tax Officer, Pondicherry
Management of Advance Insurance Co. Ltd. v Shri Gurudasmal
Union of India v Prem Kumar Jain
Keshavan Madhava Menon v. State of Bombay
G. Narayanaswami v. G. Paneerselvam
Rustom Cavasjee Cooper v. Union of India
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India
K.C. Vasanth Kumar v. State of Karnataka
Manoj Narula v. Union of India
Rai Sahib Ram Jawaya Kapur v. State of Punjab
Shamsher Singh v. State of Punjab
Tej Kiran Jain v. N. Sanjiva Reddy
Keshvan Madhava Menon v. The State of Bombay
Madhav Rao Jivaji Rao Scindia v. Union of India
State of Kerala v. N.M. Thomas
Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association v. Union of India
New Delhi Municipal Corporation v. State of Punjab
Shamsher Singh v. State of Punjab
Indra Sawhney v. Union of India
Kalpana Mehta v. Union of India
Re: Dr. Ram Ashray Yadav, Chairman, Bihar Public Service Commission
Subhash Sharma and Firdauz Taleyarkhan v. Union of India
State of Karnataka v. Union of India
Mohinder Singh Gill v. Chief Election Commissioner, New Delhi
Raghbir Singh Gill v. S. Gurcharan Singh Tohra
Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain
T.N. Seshan, CEC of India v. Union of India
Kuldip Nayar v. Union of India
In re: Under Article 143, Constitution of India, (Special Reference No. 1 of 1964)
ITC Ltd. v. Agricultural Produce Market Committee
R.C. Poudyal v. Union of India
S.R. Chaudhuri v. State of Punjab
Ashok Kumar Gupta v. State of U.P.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.