UDAY UMESH LALIT, R.SUBHASH REDDY
Urvashiben – Appellant
Versus
Krishnakant Manuprasad Trivedi – Respondent
JUDGMENT
R. Subhash Reddy, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. These civil appeals are preferred by the defendants in Civil Suit No.930 of 2017, on the file of the City Civil Court, Ahmedabad, aggrieved by the judgment and decree of the High Court of Gujarat dated 10.07.2018 passed in Regular First Appeal No.160 of 2018 and Civil Application No.1 of 2018.
3. The respondent-plaintiff has filed Civil Suit No.930 of 2017 for specific performance of the Agreement to Sell dated 13.03.1992 with regard to suit schedule property, i.e. Final Plot No.147 of Town Planning Scheme No.3 of Mouje Shekhpur-Khanpur of Ahmedabad, admeasuring 2821 Sq.Mtrs. It is the case of the plaintiff that the predecessor-in-title of the appellant-defendants, one Chaitanyabhai Patel, had agreed to sell the suit schedule property to him and execute Agreement of Sale / Sale Deed for a sale consideration of Rs.32 lacs. The total consideration amount of Rs.32 lacs was paid during the period from 15.01.1990 to 05.09.1991. It is stated that such payments are acknowledged by vouchers. It was the case of the respondent-plaintiff th
Prabhakar v. Joint Director, Sericulture Department
T. Arivandandam v. T.V. Satyapal
Hardesh Ores (P) Ltd. v. Hede & Co.
Dilboo (Smt.) (Dead) by LRs v. Dhanraji (Smt.) (Dead)
I.T.C. Limited v. Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal
Raj Narain Sarin (Dead) through LRs. v. Laxmi Devi
N.V. Srinivasa Murthy v. Mariyamma (Dead) by Proposed LRs.
Madanuri Sri Rama Chandra Murthy v. Syed Jalal
Church of Christ Charitable Trust & Educational Charitable Society v. Ponniamman Educational Trust
Gunwantbhai Mulchand Shah v. Anton Elis Farel
Rathnavathi v. Kavita Ganashamdas
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.