RANJAN GOGOI, R. BANUMATHI, NAVIN SINHA
JAGDISH CHAND – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Ranjan Gogoi, CJI.
The appellants who are the father-in-law and mother-in-law of the deceased, one Shanti Devi, have been convicted under Sections 304-B and 498-A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short, 'the IPC). They have been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years for the offence under Section 304-B IPC and for a period of one year for the offence under Section 498-A IPC. Sentences of fine for each of the offences had also been imposed. In appeal, the High Court, while affirming the conviction of the accused appellants, had, however, reduced the sentence so far as the offence under Section 304-B IPC is concerned from a period of ten years custody to a period of seven years custody. Aggrieved, this appeal has been filed.
2. The FIR in the present case was lodged by one Kalu Ram, father of the deceased, who was working as a Clerk in Government Girls High School, Pataudi. According to the complainant, the marriage between his daughter Shanti Devi and accused Raj Kumar, son of the appellants, Jagdish Chand and Mishri Devi, was solemnised on 19.4.1988. Immediately after the marriage and despite giving of sufficient gifts by the complainant to the accused pa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.