SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(SC) 35

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
UDAY UMESH LALIT, DHANANJAYA Y. CHANDRACHUD, JJ.
Wazir & Ors. – Appellants
Vs.
State of Haryana - Respondent
Civil Appeal Nos. 264-270, 338, 333-335, 336-337, 272-332, 339, 271, 340-341 & 342 of 2019 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos. 19284-19290, 27342, 26603-26605, 26607-26608, 26527-26587, 27343, 26457, 28210-28211 & 28985 of 2018) With Civil Appeal Nos. 593-617 & 343-592 of 2019 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos. 33586-33610 & 33168-33417 of 2018) (D. Nos. 41362 & 42687 of 2018)
Decided On : 11-01-2019

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Mr. Jasbir Singh Malik, Ms. Usha Nandini V., Mr. S.K. Sinha, Mr. S.J. Amith, Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta, Mr. Aditya Giri, Mr. Abhishek Singh, Mr. Siddharth Batra, Mr. Ravinder Kumar, Ms. Garima Sehgal, Mr. Vishwajeet Arora, Mr. Alok Sangwan, for Dr. Monika Gusain, Mr. Vibhuti Sushant Gupta, Mr. Ram Naresh Yadav

IMPORTANT POINT
While assessing value of the land under acquisition factors like size of plot, year of exemplar sale deeds, cost escalation etc. have to be considered.

Headnote:Land Acquisition Act, 1894 – Section 23 – Compensation – Allotments and instances of auction purchases of developed plots effected by the Development Authority itself – Cannot be made basis for assessment of compensation. (Para 16)

       (2009) 15 SCC 769 – Relied upon

       Land Acquisition Act, 1894 – Section 23 – Assessment of market value – Increase per annum – Instantly landholders relying on sale deeds for smaller plots in 1997 with maximum value of Rs.8 lakhs – Similarly acquisition after present acquisition cannot be relied upon – The villages ought to be grouped in two groups with different valuations – Courts below considering all villages together and applying same rate – Even taking a uniform base assessment as per Pran Sukh, the escalation would be different in each case – Held, 8% escalation for villages Naharpur Kasan and Kasan will be appropriate – Escalation in respect of villages Bas Kusla, Bas Haria and Dhana held to be half of that in respect of villages Naharpur Kasan and Kasan – In respect of village Manesar rise of 50% granted by High Court approved. (Para 23, 25, 27, 28)

       (2010) 11 SCC 175; (2008) 14 SCC 745; (2009) 15 SCC 769; (2018) 3 SCC 278 – Relied upon

       (2013) 14 SCC 506; (2017) 4 SCC 760 – Referred

       Facts of the case:

       About 1500 acres of land was notified under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for the public purpose under Phase I, II, III and IV.

       Appropriate declarations under Section 6 of the Act were issued by the State Government for all the four phases.

       After a series of litigation reaching up to supreme Court the High Court assessed the compensation at Rs.41.40 lakhs per acre along with statutory benefits in respect of lands acquired in villages Naharpur Kasan, Kasan, Bas Haria, Bas Kusla and Dhana (covered by Phases II and III). The compensation in village Maneswar (covered by Phase-IV) was assessed after giving 50% enhancement at Rs.62.10 lakhs per acre along with statutory benefits. As regards M/s Kohli Holdings Pvt. Ltd., additional component of 30% was also awarded on account of severance charges, over and above the rate of Rs.62.10 lakhs per acre.

       This order is under challenge in these appeals.

       Finding of the Court:

       (a) In respect of lands under acquisition from villages Naharpur Kasan and Kasan the market value shall be Rs.37.54 lakhs per acre. Additionally, all statutory benefits would be payable.

       (b) In respect of lands under acquisition from villages Bas Kusla, Bas Haria and Dhana the market value shall be Rs.28.77 lakhs per acre.

       Additionally, all statutory benefits would be payable.

       © In respect of lands from village Manesar the market value shall be Rs.56.31 lakhs per acre. Additionally, all statutory benefits would be payable.

       (d) M/s. Kohli Holdings Private Limited shall not be entitled to any severance charges.

       Result: Appeals preferred by HSIIDC and the State of Haryana partly allowed. Appeals preferred by all the landholders including M/s. Kohli Holdings Private Limited dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

Uday Umesh Lalit. J.

Leave granted.

2. The landholders and HSIIDC1 have filed these cross appeals challenging the final judgment and order dated 09.03.2018 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in RFA No.2373 of 2010 (O&M) titled Madan Pal (III) v. State of Haryana and another and in all connected matters. Since all these matters arise out of the same acquisition proceedings, they are dealt with together by this common Judgment.

3. About 1500 acres of land was notified under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act") for the public purpose of development of Industrial Model Township, Manesar, Gurgaon Phases II, III and IV by three separate notifications. The proposed acquisition was:-

(i) re: Phase II

About 177 Acres 5 Kanal 19 Marla situated in the Revenue Estate of Villages Kasan, Bas Kusla, Naharpur Kasan and Manesar, Tehsil and District Gurgaon was notified on 06.03.2002.

(ii) re: Phase III

About 598 Acres 5 Kanal 12 Marla situated in the Revenue Estate of Villages Bas Kusla, Kasan, Bas Haria and Dhana, Tehsil and District Gurgaon was notified on 07.03.2002.

(iii) re: Phase IV

About 657 Acres 4 Kanal 3 Marla situated in the Revenue Estate of villages Bas Kusla, Bas Haria, Dhana and Kasan, Tehsil and District Gurgaon was notified on 26.02.2002.

4. Appropriate declarations under Section 6 of the Act were issued by the State Government in respect of said lands under Phases II, III and IV on 15.11.2002, 25.11.2001 and 18.11.2002 respectively. Thereafter:

(i) In respect of lands proposed to be acquired for Phase II, Award No.5 of 2003 was passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer (C)-cum-Land Acquisition Collector, Gurgaon on 22.07.2003 and the compensation awarded to the land owners for different types of lands was as under:-

Kinds of Land and rates per acre

Village

Chahi

Banjar

Gair Mumkin

Kasan

5,25,000/-

5,00,000/-

7,50,000/-

Bas Kusla

2,25,000/-

1,75,000/-

3,60,000/-

Naharpur Kasan

5,25,000/-

4,00,000/-

7,20,000/-

Manesar

7,00,000/-

7,00,000/-

10,00,000/-

The extent of lands under various categories in the aforesaid villages was set out in the award as under:-

Name of village

Kinds of Land

Total

Chahi

Gair Mumkin

Banjar

Kanal

Marla

Kasan

210-08

19-07

0

229

15

Bas Kusla

752-18

47-17

0

800

15

Naharpur Kasan

52-12

0-02

0

52

14

Manesar

272-00

16-05

09-07

297

12

Grand Total

1287-18

83-11

09-07

1380

16

(ii) In respect of lands in Phase No.III, Award No.1 of 2003 was passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer (C)-cum-Land Acquisition Collector, Gurgaon on 24.12.2003 and the compensation awarded to the land owners for different types of lands was as under:-

Kinds of land and rates per acre

Village

Chahi

Gair Mumkin

Kasan

5,25,000/-

7,50,000/-

Bas

2,25,000/-

3,60,000/-

Kusla Bas Haria

2,25,000/-

3,60,000/-

Dhana

2,25,000/-

3,60,000/-

The extent of lands under various categories in the aforesaid villages was set out in the award as under:-

Name of Village

Kinds of land

Total

Chahi

Gair Mumkin

Kanal

Marla

K

M

K

M

Kasan

1602

8

234

11

1836

19

Bas Kusla

955

6

32

11

987

17

Bas Haria

163

15

2

7

166

2

Dhana

1740

4

58

10

1798

14

Grand Total

4461

13

327

19

4789

12

(iii) In respect of lands in Phase No.IV, Award No.6 of 2004 was passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer (C)-cum-Land Acquisition Collector, Gurgaon on 20.05.2004 and the compensation awarded to the land owners for different types of lands was as under:-

Kinds of land and rates per acre

Village

Chahi

Gair Mumkin

Bas Kusla

2,25,000/-

3,60,000/-

Bas Haria

2,25,000/-

3,60,000/-

Dhana

2,25,000/-

3,60,000/-

Kasan

5,25,000/-

7,50,000/-

The extent of lands under various categories in the aforesaid villages w









































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top