SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(SC) 1124

R. M. LODHA, J. CHELAMESWAR, A. K. SIKRI
Ranjit Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

R.M. Lodha, J.

1. Delay in filing applications for substitution is condoned.

2. Applications for substitution are allowed.

3. Permission to file special leave petitions is granted.

4. Delay in filing the special leave petitions is condoned.

5. Leave granted in SLP(C) Nos. 22324 of 2013, 5405 of 2014, 16788 of 2014 and S.L.P.(C)@ CC No. 12129 of 2013.

6. In this group of appeals, the question for consideration is whether there is any scope for enhancement of compensation with regard to the subject lands.

7. The subject lands pertain to five different notifications published on 04.06.1980, 13.03.1981, 22.06.1982, 05.07.1982 and 10.02.1983 and are located in Sectors 3, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 12 Part-I near Karnal bypass and so also Karnal Kunjpura Road.

8. Learned senior Counsel and learned Counsel appearing for many of the Appellants heavily relied upon the decision of this Court in the group of matters, lead matter being Civil Appeal No. 2187 of 2013 arising from Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No. 17615 of 2008, 'Subhash Subhash Chander and Ors. v. State of Haryana and Anr.' given on 19.02.2013. They submitted that matter in Subhash Chander's case (supra) pertains to four no










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top