SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(SC) 108

DIPAK MISRA, A. M. KHANWILKAR, D. Y. CHANDRACHUD
All India Judges Association – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.T.M. Sampath, , For Petitioners Bharat Sangal, S.N. Bhat, Mrs. Amita Gupta, Pravir Kumar Jain, Abhijit Sengupta, A. Venayagam Balan, Rakesh Dahiya, Akhilesh Kumar Pandey, S. Wasim A. Qadri, T.A. Khan, A.K. Sharma, Mrs. Anil Katiyar, State of H.P. Vikas Mahajan, Vinod Sharma, State of Haryana Arun Bhardwaj, Ashish Pandey, Prateek Rai, Ms. Gauraan Bhardwaj, Shrutanjaya Bhardwaj, State of Mizoram: K.N. Madhusoodhanan, R. Sathish, Ms. A. Subhashini, State of Goa : Ms. Mayuri Nayyar Chawla, Santosh Salvador Rebello, P.S. Sudheer, Ms. Shruti Jose, State of Karnataka : V.N. Raghupathy, Parikshit P. Angadi, State of Telangana : S. Udaya Kumar Sagar, Mrityunjai Singh, State of Arunachal : P. Anil Shrivastav, Rituraj Biswas, State of Tripura : Shuvodeep Roy, Rituraj Biswas, U.T. of Puducherry : V.G. Pragasam, S. Prabu Ramasubramanian, State of Nagaland : Mrs. K. Enatoli Sema, Amit Kumar Singh, Z.H. Isaac Haiding, State of Bihar : Gopal Singh, Manish Kumar, Shivam Singh, Aditya Raina, Shreyas Jain, Ms. Aprajit Sud, Kumar Milind, State of T.N. : M. Yogesh Kanna, S. Partha Sarathi, T.N. Rama Rao, Hitesh Kumar Sharma, T. Veera Reddy, T.V. George, Ajay Bansal, Gaurav Yadava Ms. Veena Bansal, U.T. of A&N Ms. G. Indira, K.V. Jagdishvaran, State of Punjab : Karan Bharihoke, Ms. Navkiran Bolay, State of Rajasthan : S.S Shamshery, AAG, Rajasthan, Amit Sharma, Ankit Raj, Ms. Indira Bhakar, Ms. Ruchi Kohli, State of Chhattisgarh : Aniruddha P. Mayee, Ms. Charudatta Mahindrakar, A. Selvin Raja, Chirag Jain, State of Kerala : G. Prakash, Jishnu M.L., Mrs. Priyanka Prakash, Mrs. Beena Prakash, Jharkhand HC Krishnanand Pandeya, State of uttarakhand Ms. Rachana Srivastava, Ms. Monika, State of Gujarat : Ms. Hemantika Wahi, Ms. Jesal Wahi, Ms. Vishakha, Ms. Mamta Singh, Ashok K. Srivastava, Arun K. Sinha, Anip Sachthey, Ashok Mathur, Ajit Pudussery, B. D. Sharma, Mrs. Bina Gupta, C.N. Sree Kumar, D.N. Goburdhan, Gopal Balwant Sathe, Guntur Prabhakar, K. Ram Kumar, L.K. Pandey, M. Veerappa, M.A. Krishna Moorthy, M/S. Gagrat And Co, Naresh K. Sharma, Parijat Sinha, P.K. Jain, P. Parmeswaran, Pradeep Misra, Raj Kumar Mehta, R.N. Keswani, R. Sathish, Surya Kant, Sunil Kumar Jain, S.K. Bhattacharya, S.R. Setia, Sanjay Parikh, Shrish Kumar Misra, Tara Chandra Sharma, T.L. Garg, T.G. Narayanan Nair, Mrs. V.D. Khanna, Pravir Choudhary, Anil Nag, M/S. Arputham Aruna And Co, K.R. Sasiprabhu, Ranjan Mukherjee, Ms. S. Janani, Haresh Raichura, Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Annam D. N. Rao, Mrs. Revathy Raghavan, Ashok Kumar Singh, Rakesh K. Sharma, Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, Dr. J.P. Dhanda, Chander Shekhar Ashri, B.S. Banthia, Mukesh K. Giri, Ms. N. Annapoorani, Kishan Datta, Mrs. Anjani Aiyagari, Radha Shyam Jena, Prashant Kumar, Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair, P.I. Jose, Rajiv Mehta, Ms. Kumud Lata Das, Praveen Swarup, Ms. Meera Mathur, Kamal Mohan Gupta, Ratan Kumar Choudhuri, Sanjay Jain, Rashmikumar Manilal Vithlani, V.K. Sidharthan, Romy Chacko, Dr. Kailash Chand, Dr. Sushil Balwada, Rajesh Srivastava, Ms. Anitha Shenoy, Kanhaiya Priyadarshi, Anupam Lal Das, Ravi Prakash Mehrotra, M/s. Parekh & Co., Ajay Sharma, T. Mahipal, Amit Kumar, P.V. Yogeswaran, P.V. Dinesh, Abhisth Kumar, Dharmendra Kumar Sinha, Sanjay Sharawat, T. Harish Kumar, Alok Kumar, Manish K. Bishnoi, Ms. A. Sumathi, Ms. Anagha S. Desai, Sunil Fernandes, M.A. Chinnasamy, M. Shoeb Alam, Gopal Jha, Anandh Kannan N., Sibo Sankar Mishra, Apoorv Kurup, Arjun Garg, T.V. Ratnam, Satish Kumar, Ajay Kumar, Shibashish Misra, Adv.

ORDER

1. This interlocutory application basically relates to infrastructure of the courts especially in subordinate courts. A detailed order was passed on 24.01.2011 which pertained to various projects of court buildings, residential quarters and all other aspects. On 04.04.2011, the following order came to be passed:-

“By our Order dated 21st February, 2011, we had directed States of Maharashtra, Gujarat and Uttarakhand to answer five questions, which, for the sake of brevity, are reiterated hereinbelow:

[1] Since when Proposals/Projects are pending and reasons why they have not been cleared till today?

[2] For how long and why Proposals pending for acquisition of land have not been cleared by the Collectors?

[3] Why Government lands, which are available, are not being urgently made available for Court Buildings and Residential Quarters?

[4] What steps are being taken to expeditiously complete Projects which are under construction?

[5] How many pending Proposals would receive administrative and financial sanction during the next Financial Year?

States of Gujarat and Maharashtra have sought time to put in their response. Request is granted. Hence, four weeks' time is granted. No further ad































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top