SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(SC) 313

UDAY UMESH LALIT, M.R.SHAH
Babu Ram – Appellant
Versus
Santokh Singh (deceased) through his LRs – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

UDAY UMESH LALIT, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. This appeal arises out of final judgment and order dated 07.05.2018 passed by the High Court (High Court of Himachal Pradesh at Shimla) in Regular Second Appeal No.457 of 2002 and raises questions regarding scope and applicability of Section 22 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), and particularly, whether preferential right given to an heir of a Hindu under said Section 22 will be inapplicable if the property in question is an agricultural land.

3. The facts leading to the filing of this appeal, in brief, are as under:

(a) Two brothers, namely, Santokh Singh (Original Plaintiff) and Nathu Ram, (Original Defendant No.1) sons of Lajpat S/o Rupa inherited, among others, certain agricultural lands after the death of their father. According to Santokh Singh an arrangement was arrived at, in terms of which the brothers were to be in separate enjoyment of certain specified pieces of land. Since Nathu Ram was not interested in continuing with said arrangement he gave a legal notice to Santokh Singh and later































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top