SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(SC) 1165

ARUN MISHRA, M.R.SHAH
State of Jharkhand – Appellant
Versus
HSS Integrated SDN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner(s):Devashish Bharuka, Ravi Bharuka,Adv. Sarvshree, Justine George, Advocates
For the Respondent(s):Manoj Swarup, Ankit Swarup, Jawad Tariq, Advocates

JUDGMENT :

M.R. SHAH, J.

1. Aggrieved by the impugned judgment and order dated 30.01.2019 passed by the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi in Commercial Appeal No. 01 of 2018, by which the High Court has dismissed the said appeal preferred by the petitioners herein under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short ‘the Arbitration Act’) and has confirmed the award declared by the learned Arbitral Tribunal, confirmed by the First Appellate Court, the original appellants have preferred the present special leave petition.

2. This special leave petition arises out of the contractual dispute between the petitioners- State and the respondents in relation to a consultancy agreement over construction of six-lane Divided Carriage Way of certain parts of Ranchi Ring Road. Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 acted as a consortium for providing such consultancy and supervisory services. An agreement was entered into between the parties on 28.08.2007. The original work period under the said agreement was for 36 months, i.e. from 01.10.2007 to 30.09.2010. There was a dispute with res

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top