A.M.KHANWILKAR, AJAY RASTOGI
Municipal Corpn. of Greater Mumbai – Appellant
Versus
Harish Lamba of Bombay, Indian Inhabitant – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
A.M. Khanwilkar, J.
1. This appeal takes exception to the judgment and order dated 21st November, 2006 of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Writ Petition No.1206 of 1999, whereby the bills/demand raised by appellant including towards water benefit tax and the Warrant of Attachment in respect of the stated premises belonging to the respondents came to be quashed and set aside being illegal.
2. The appellant is a corporate body constituted under the provisions of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 (for short, “1888 Act” or “the Act”) and respondent No.1 is a sole proprietor in the business, which was carried on by him in the name and style of Volga Frozen Foods and Ice Cream Company, hereinafter referred to as the “said firm”. The stated business was located at Volga House, 1C, K.K. Marg, Mahalaxmi, Bombay-400034, hereinafter referred to as the “said premises”. The respondent No.2 is the landlord of respondent No.1 in respect of the said premises. The respondent No.3 is the tenant of respondent No.2 in respect of the remainder area of the said building oth
Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay v. M/s. Nagpal Printing Mills
Sumer Builders v. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
Kalyan Municipal Council v. Usha Paper Products (P) Ltd.
Municipal Corporation of City of Hubli v. Subha Rao Hanumatharao Prayag
State of Rajasthan v. J.K. Synthetics Limited
Kanoria Chemicals and Industries Ltd. v. U.P. State Electricity Board
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.