SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Indira Banerjee, JJ.
Remya P. and Ors. – Petitioner(s)
Versus
Dr K M Abraham – Respondent(s)
Contempt Petition (Civil) No 1920 of 2017 in Writ Petition (C) No 213 of 2011
Decided On : 03-07-2019
Contempt Proceedings - Endosulfan Victims - The Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Section 2(b) - Section 12 - Section 20 - Section 21 - Section 22 - Section 23
Fact of the Case:
The contempt proceedings were initiated due to non-payment of compensation to four individuals affected by Endosulfan, despite a court order directing the release of compensation within a specified time frame.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the affected individuals were entitled to compensation as they were undergoing treatment due to the effects of Endosulfan, and directed the government to release the compensation to the natural guardians of the minors within a specified time frame.
Issues: Non-payment of compensation to Endosulfan victims, categorization of affected individuals, contempt of court
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the entitlement of affected individuals to compensation as per the court's previous order and directed the government to release the compensation within a specified time frame. The court also highlighted the possibility of recovering the compensation from the concerned industry or the Government of India.
Final Decision: The court directed the government to release the compensation to the natural guardians of the four minors within a period of two months and disposed of the contempt proceedings. The petitioners were granted liberty to apply for revival of the contempt proceedings if the direction was not complied with.
ORDER
1. The contempt proceedings have been initiated for non-payment of the compensation of Rupees five lakhs in pursuance of the order of this Court dated 10 January 2017 to four affected individuals, viz., Kumari Archana, Master Afsal, Ms Nisha and Kum Vijayalakshmi.
2. The Chief Secretary of the Government of Kerala has filed an affidavit specifically dealing with the factual position in relation to the aforesaid four individuals. The relevant part of the affidavit is extracted below:
“6. The status of the specific cases pointed out by the petitioner are as follows:
a) Remya P (Mother of Kumari Archana): Kumari Archana is a native of Pullur Periye Grama Panchayath and is included in the Endosulfan Victims List with O.P. No.59717. She attended speciality medical camp in 2013. The expert medical panel which recategorized the list has included Kum. Archana in ‘Other’ category, which is not eligible for National Human Rights Commission recommended financial compensation. Kumari Archana is undergoing free treatment under the rehabilitation project at Sreechithra Institute of Medical Sciences, Thiruvananthapuram. Smt. Remya has also been paid a monthly pension of Rs 1200 and already a total amount of Rs 40,400 is paid in this regard.
b) Jameela M.P. (Mother of Master Afsal): Master Afsal is a native of PullurPeriye grama Panchayath and is included in the Endosulfan Victims List with O.P. No.4542. He attended speciality medical camp in 2010. The expert medical panel which categorized the list has included Master Afsal in ‘Other’ category, which is not eligible for National Human Rights Commission recommended compensation. Master Afsal has been given free treatment since 2011. He is taking growth hormone injection every month from 2011 to February 2016. The cost per injection is Rs 16000. However, it is provided free of cost to him under the scheme. Under the Endosulfan Victims free treatment scheme, the State Government has already spent Rs.8,96,000/- for Master Afsal. The State Government is also providing other medicines through Community Health Centre, Periye, Kasaragod. Master Afsal is also paid a monthly pension of Rs.1200 and till date he has been paid Rs.1,00,400 under the pension scheme. He was also paid a one time education scholarship of Rs.3000/-.
c) Smt. Sisily (Mother of Ms. Nisha): Ms Nisha is a native of Kodom Belur Grama Panchayath and is included in the Endosulfan Victims List with O.P. No.5283. She attended speciality medical camp in 2010. The expert medical panel which recategorized the list has included Ms. Nisha in ‘Other’ category, which is not eligible for National Human Rights Commission recommended compensation. The State Government has been giving free treatment to Kum. Nisha at Pariyaram Medical College. Medicines are disbursed every month from Community Health Centre, Panathady, Kasaragod. The Cost of medicines from 2012 to 2017 is rs.8981/-. Ms. Nisha receives Rs.1700 per month as pension to Endosulfan victims and so far she has received a total amount of rs.1,41,400 in this regard.
d) Smt. M. Badhavi (Mother of Kum. Vijayalakshmi): Kum. Vijayalakshmi is a native of Muliyar Grame Panchayath and is included in the Endosulfan Victims List with PID No.1978/2. She attended speciality medical camp in 2010. The expert medical panel which recategorised the list has included Kum. Vijayalakshmi in ‘Other’ category, which is not eligible for National Human Rights Commission recommended compensation. Under the Endosulfan Victims relief scheme, Kum. Vijayalakshmi is provided with home based physiotherapy service. Free medicines are provided through Community Health Centre, Muliyar, Kasaragod. Since 2012 the State Government has spent Rs.65658/- to supply medicines to her. Kumari Vijaylekshmi has been paid a monthly pension of Rs.2200 under the Endosulfan scheme and a total amount of Rs.1,82,400 is disbursed to her till date.”
3. The above extract from the affidavit leaves no manner of doubt that each of the four individu
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.