Back
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
(RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS)
RANJAN GOGOI, CJI., S.A. BOBDE, D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, ASHOK BHUSHAN, S. ABDUL NAZEER, JJ.
MOHAMMAD SIDDIQ (D) THR. LRS. – Appellant(s)
VERSUS
MAHANT SURESH DAS & ORS. – Respondent(s)
Civil Appeal No(s).10866-10867/2010 WITH C.A. Nos.4768-4771/2011 (III-A) C.A. No.2636/2011 (III-A) C.A. No.821/2011 (III-A)
Decided On : 02-08-2019
Mediation - Settlement - The mediation proceedings did not result in any final settlement.
Fact of the Case:
The mediation proceedings did not result in any final settlement, and the court proceeded with the hearing of the cases/appeals.
Finding of the Court:
The court decided to proceed with the hearing of the cases/appeals as the mediation proceedings did not result in any final settlement.
Issues: The main issue was the lack of a final settlement through the mediation proceedings.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision to proceed with the hearing of the cases/appeals was influenced by the lack of a final settlement through the mediation proceedings.
Final Decision: The court decided to commence the hearing of the cases/appeals on a day-to-day basis until the arguments are concluded.
ORDER
1. We have received the report submitted by Justice (Retd.) F.M.I. Kalifulla, the Chairman of the Mediation Committee. We have perused the same.
2. The mediation proceedings have not resulted in any final settlement. We, therefore, have to proceed with the hearing of the cases/appeals, which will commence on and from 6.8.2019 (Tuesday). The hearing which will be on day-to-day basis until the arguments are concluded will start with the appeals arising out of Suit Nos.3 and 5. The learned counsel(s) in the lead appeals as well as the learned counsel(s) who will be making lead arguments on behalf of the respondents in the appeals arising out of the aforesaid Suits may, for the convenience of the Court, indicate the pleadings and the evidence on which they propose to rely, so that the officials of the Registry can keep the said documents ready for perusal of the Court.
AI
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
