A.M.KHANWILKAR, DINESH MAHESHWARI
Tanvi Behl – Appellant
Versus
Shrey Goel – Respondent
ORDER :
Dinesh Maheshwari, J.
Preliminary
1. Leave granted.
2. These four appeals by special leave, directed against the common judgment and order dated 23.04.2019, as passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in CWP No. 8234 of 2019 (O&M) and CWP No. 9565 of 2019 (O&M) and involving essentially the same questions relating to the legality and validity of domicile/residence-based reservation for admission to the Post Graduate Medical Courses (MD/MS Courses 2019), [Hereinafter also referred to as “the PG Medical Courses”] in Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh [Hereinafter also referred to as “the Medical College”/“the said Medical College”], have been considered together and shall be governed by this common order. [It may be noticed at the outset that the questioned reservation has been provided for the ‘candidates with background of Chandigarh’. The candidates eligible under this category are those
(i) who have studied for 5 years in Chandigarh; or (ii) whose parents have resided in Chandigarh for a period of 5 years; or (iii) who are children of t
Yogesh Bhardwaj v. State of U.P.
Saurabh Chaudri v. Union of India
Dr. Pradeep Jain v. Union of India
Jagdish Saran v. Union of India
Nikhil Himthani v. State of Uttarakhand
Vishal Goyal v. State of Karnataka
Dr. Kriti Lakhina v. State of Karnataka
Satyabrata Sahoo v. State of Orissa
Yatinkumar Jasubhai Patel v. State of Gujarat
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.