MOHAN M.SHANTANAGOUDAR, K.M.JOSEPH
MOHANDAS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
K.M. Joseph, J. - Leave granted.
2. Appellants are the petitioners before the High Court of Bombay. By the impugned Judgment, the Writ Petition filed by them stands dismissed.
3. The prayers sought by the appellants are as follows:
"(A) Quash and set aside the Reservation No. S - 169 in the Final Development Plan of Gondia (Second Revised), whereby the land bearing Survey Nos. 405/1, 406/2, 407/2, 410/2 and 411 of Mouza - Gondia (Bk.), Tehsil & District - Gondia, belonging to the petitioners is reserved for Shopping Complex and Vegetable Market (Annexure "3").
(B) Hold and declare that the land bearing Survey Nos. 405/1, 406/2, 407/2, 410/2 and 411 of Mouza - Gondia (Bk.), Tehsil & District - Gondia, are not reserved for the development of Shopping Complex and Vegetable market vide Reservation No.S - 169 in the Final Development Plan of Gondia (Second Revised) and that the petitioners are free to use and develop the said land as true lawful and absolute owners thereof as per the user for the adjacent land provided under the Final Development Plan of Gondia (Second Revised) (Annexure "3")."
4. Briefly, their case, before the High Court, is as follows:
Appellants are the owners o
Bhavnagar University v. Palitana Sugar Mill (P) Ltd.
Chhabildas v. State of Maharashtra
Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay v. Dr. Hakimwadi Tenants' Association
Girnar Traders (2) v. State of Maharashtra
Girnar Traders (3) v. State of Maharashtra
Shrirampur Municipal Council v. Satvabhamabai Bhimaii Dawkher
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.