SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(SC) 336

ASHOK BHUSHAN, M.R.SHAH
Ashish Seth – Appellant
Versus
Sumit Mittal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner(s):Garima Prashad, Piyush Kant Roy, Advocates
For the Respondent(s):Garima Prashad, Ayush Sharma, Akhilesh Kumar Pandey, Sanjay Kumar Visen, Ankit Goel, Sachin Mittal, Bankey Bihari, Advocates

JUDGMENT :

M.R. SHAH, J.

1. All these Contempt Petitions being Contempt Petition(C) No. 34/2016, Contempt Petition (C) No. 257/2016 and Contempt Petition (C) No. 889/2017 are preferred by the respective applicants who as such were parties to Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 5 of 2015 and also parties to the Memorandum of Settlement dated 4.5.2015 which ultimately was made a part of the order passed by this Court dated 5.5.2015 disposing of Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 5/2015 and Writ Petition (Criminal) No.11/2015, to initiate the contempt proceedings against concerned respective respondents for non-compliance of the order passed by this Court in the aforesaid writ petition.

2. The facts leading to the present contempt petitions in nutshell are as under:

That one Triveni Ferrous Infrastructure Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as ‘TFIPL’) was a joint venture company constituted of two groups – one being the Seth Group [consisting of Mr. Surrender Seth, Mr. Ashish Seth, M/s Ferrous Forging Ltd., M/s Ferrous Alloys Forging Pvt. Ltd. (FAFPL), M/s Ferrous Township Pvt. Ltd. (FTPL) and


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top