SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(SC) 357

DEEPAK GUPTA, ANIRUDDHA BOSE
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, DELHI-III – Appellant
Versus
UNI PRODUCTS INDIA LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Syed Abdul Haseeb, Advocate, Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, Advocates
For the Respondent:Ms. Charanya Lakshmikumaran Advocates

JUDGMENT

Aniruddha Bose, J.

These two appeals against the decision of the Customs Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) rendered on 16th July, 2008 require adjudication on the question as to whether "car matting" would come within Chapter 57 of the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 under the heading "Carpets and Other Textile Floor Coverings" or they would be classified under Chapter 87 thereof, which relates to "Vehicles other than Railway or Tramway Rolling-Stock and Parts and Accessories Thereof". The appeals are against a common decision and we shall also deal with both these appeals together in this judgment. The respondent-assessee want their goods to be placed under Chapter heading 5703.90. We shall refer to the specific entries against this item later in the judgment. The respondent, at the material point of time were engaged in the business of manufacture of textile floor coverings and car matting. The subject-goods have been referred to interchangeably by the revenue also as car mattings and car carpets. The respondent, at the material tim


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top