SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(SC) 1421

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Ranjan Gogoi, CJI., Deepak Gupta, Sanjiv Khanna, JJ.
BILKIS YAKUB RASOOL - APPELLANT
VERSUS
STATE OF GUJARAT AND OTHERS - RESPONDENTS
Writ Petition (Crl.L No.118 Of 2003 And Criminal Appeal Nos.727-733 Of 2019 (Arising Out Of S.L.P.(Crl.) Nos.10397-10403 Of 2017)
Decided on : 23-04-2019

Advocates Appeared:
For the appellant :Shobha Gupta, Ritu Bhardwaj, Sneha Kalita, Sourav Roy, Joyshree Barman, Advocates
For the Respondent:K. Radhakrishnan, R. Balasubramanian, Hari Priya, Hemantika Wahi, Jesal Wahi, Vishakha, P. Parmeswaran, Advocates

The need for just and fair compensation, considering the exceptional loss and suffering experienced by the victim.

Headnote:

Compensation - Riots - Writ Petition (Crl. Appeal No. 118 of 2003) - [Section 357 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973] - The court directed the State Government to pay compensation of Rs. 50,00,000 to the victim and provide her with employment and government accommodation. The court emphasized the need for just and fair compensation, considering the exceptional loss and suffering experienced by the victim.

ORDER

Crl.A. Nos. 727-733 of 2019 @ (S.L.P.(Crl.) Nos. 10397-10403 of 2017)

Leave granted.

1. By order dated 23rd October, 2017 in Writ Petition (Crl.) No.118 of 2003, this Court had directed as follows:-

    "On the previous occasion, this Court had observed that two prayers remained to be adverted to namely, amount of compensation and initiation of departmental action against the police personnel, who have been convicted. As far as the first aspect is concerned, it is submitted by Ms. Shobha, learned counsel for the petitioner, that the trial Court has granted a meagre amount of compensation though the petitioner is entitled to more. In our considered opinion, the petitioner should assail the order of granting compensation in a separate special leave petition so that this Court can advert to the same. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to file a separate special leave petition for enhancement of compensation.

    As far as the second aspect is concerned, Ms. Hemantika Wahi, learned counsel for the State of Gujarat shall apprise this Court whether disciplinary action has been initiated against the police personnel or not."

2. Pursuant thereto, insofar as compensation aspect is concerned, S.L.P.(Crl.) Nos. 10397-10403/2017 has been filed by the petitioner. We will take up the issue of compensation in the first instance.

3. The appellant, Bilkis Yakub Rasool, is a victim of riots which occurred in the aftermath of the Godhara train burning incident in the State of Gujarat on February 27, 2002. While eventually, the perpetrators of the crime including the police personnel stand punished, the appellant, who was aged twenty-one years and pregnant at that time, having lost all members of her family in the diabolical and brutal attacks needs to be adequately compensated. Additional facts which we must note are that the appellant was repeatedly gang raped and was a mute and helpless witness to her three-and-a-half-year-old daughter being butchered to death. This factual position is undisputed and unchallenged in light of the findings of the trial court upheld by the High Court and this Court.

4. The appellant, we are informed, is presently about forty years of age and is without any home and lives with her daughter who was born after the incident. She has been coerced to live life of a nomad and as an orphan, and is barely sustaining herself on the charity of NGOs, having lost company of her family members. The gruesome and horrific acts of violence have left an indelible imprint on her mind which will continue to torment and cripple her.

5. We do not have to search and elaborate upon principles of law to come to the conclusion that the appellant deserves to be adequately compensated. It is only the quantum of compensation that needs to be worked out by the Court. Time and again this Court has held that the compensation so awarded must be just and fair, and the criteria objective. However, this case has to be dealt with differently as the loss and suffering evident from the facts stated above surpass normal cases. Taking into account the totality of the facts of the case, we are of the view that compensation of Rs. 50,00,000/- (Rupees fifty lakh only) to be paid by the State Government within two weeks from today, on proper identification, would meet the ends of justice. Coupled with the aforesaid relief, we deem it proper to further direct the State Government to provide the appellant with an employment under the State, if she wishes so and is inclined, and also to offer her government accommodation at a place of her choice, if she is willing to live in such accommodation.

6. With the aforesaid direction, the appeals relating to compensation are disposed of.

Writ Petition (Crl. Appeal No. 118 of 2003)

7. Learned counsel for the State of Gujarat has placed before this Court consequential orders passed by the authorities of the State pursuant to the order of this Court dated 29th March, 2019. Though learned counsel has prayed for time to bring the s


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top